Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6692 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 16628 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
ALEX RAJU
S/O RAJU, AGED 52 YEARS
CHINNAKANAL, KUTHUNGALTHERY,
MONT FORT SCHOOL, CHINNAKANAL,
IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685618
BY ADVS.
GEORGE ABRAHAM
JOBY D JOSEPH
MARY CATHERINE PRIYANKA P.S.
RESPONDENT/S:
1 DISTRICT COLLECTOR
CIVIL STATION,
IDUKKI, PIN - 685602
2 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI, PIN - 685613
3 TAHSILDAR
UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK,
IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685554
4 VILLAGE OFFICER
CHINNAKKANAL VILLAGE,
(VIA) UDUMBANCHOLA,
IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685554
SMT.DEEPA V, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC No.16628 of 2023
2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is one of the legal heirs of one Raju, who
obtained certain extent of land through Ext.P1 patta issued
by the Special Tahsildar (LA), Rajakumari. According to the
petitioner, the land was mutated in the name of the aforesaid
person. Petitioner, who is the son of Raju, has approached this
Court, being aggrieved by the fact that mutation has not been
effected and land tax has not been received in respect of the
lands belonging to late Raju, which have devolved on the
petitioner as his legal heir, on the ground that there are
certain proceedings in contemplation regarding the
genuineness of patta issued to the predecessor in interest of
the aforesaid Raju.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that similar issue was considered by this Court
in W.P. (C.) No.39431 of 2022, where this Court in paragraph
No.4 held as follows:-
"4. A similar issue was considered by this Court in WPC No.2610/2020, wherein this Court had directed the enquiry to be completed within three months with a rider WPC No.16628 of 2023
that, if the enquiry is not completed within the said three months, the basic tax should be accepted from the petitioner subject to the outcome of the enquiry. The enquiry had been started long back as can be seen from the judgment in WPC No.2610/2020 dated 27.02.2020."
It is submitted that similar directions may be issued in the
case of the lands covered by Ext.P1 patta as well.
3. Learned Government Pleader would submit that
there is no objection in a direction being issued as contained
in the judgment in W.P.(C.). No.39431 of 2022, making it clear
that any mutation and acceptance of land tax from the
petitioner will not prejudice any inquiry or proceedings, that
may be initiated, regarding the genuineness of the patta
under which the petitioner claims to have title to the property.
Accordingly, the writ petition will stand disposed of,
directing the respondents to effect mutations of the
properties owned by the petitioner as per Exts.P1 and P2
documents, without prejudice to any proceedings that may be
initiated by the respondents or any competent authority with
regard to the genuineness of the patta under which the
petitioner claims. I make it clear that mutation and WPC No.16628 of 2023
acceptance of land tax will always be subject to the result of
such proceedings.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P., JUDGE rkj WPC No.16628 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16628/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A COPY OF THE PATTA ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) RAJAKUMARI DATE 13-7-1994 Exhibit P2 A COPY OF THE LAND TAX PAID IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER DATED 2-8-1995 Exhibit P3 A COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE DATED 9-11-2008 Exhibit P4 A COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!