Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7606 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 23000 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
VEERAN HAJI K.K
AGED 67 YEARS
S/O. ABOOBACKER, KAPPADATHKUZHIYIL HOUSE,
KODANGAD P.O, KONDOTTY TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673642
BY ADVS.
P.SAMSUDIN
MILAN RACHEL MATHEW
NASRIN WAHAB
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PERINTHALMANNA
OFFICE OF THE RDO PERINTHALMANNA, MINI CIVIL STATION,
PERINTHALMANNA P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679322
2 THE TAHSILDAR (LR )
KONDOTTY TALUK, KONDOTTY P.O,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673638
3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
NEDIYIRUPPU VILLAGE,
NEDIYIRUPPU P.O, KONDOTTY TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673640
BY ADV.SMT.SAROJINI K.G., GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.23000/2023 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 14th day of July, 2023
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking direction to the
first respondent - Revenue Divisional Officer - to consider and pass
orders on Ext.P5 application within a time frame to be fixed by this
Court.
2. Petitioner is the absolute owner in possession of 6.37
Ares of land comprised in re-survey No.39/16 and 39/20 of
Nediyiruppu Village in Kondotty Taluk, Malappuram District. The
property is purchased from the erstwhile owners in 1986. The
property was originally a paddy land as per the revenue records.
By the passage of time, the land and properties appurtenant
thereto are all covered as dry land.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner wants to use the land for other purposes. Petitioner filed
Ext.P5 application dated 02.07.2022 in Form 6 before the first
respondent. The application is not disposed of so far. Learned
counsel also submits that unless the application is considered
expeditiously, petitioner will be put to untold hardship and loss.
4. Learned Government Pleader opposes all the
contentions made by the petitioner in the Writ Petition, however,
submitted that since the petitioner has invoked a statutory remedy
under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and
Wetland Rules, 2008, the application submitted by the petitioner
can be considered by the respondents.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the
learned Government Pleader.
6. Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land
and Wetland Rules, 2008 provides for making applications for
changing the nature of land in revenue records. Petitioner has
invoked the statutory provision of Rule 12(1) of Rules, 2008, by
filing application in Form 6. The first respondent is bound to
consider the application and pass appropriate orders thereon.
In the facts and circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed
of with a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P5
application and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance
with law, if the same is filed with all supporting documents and
requisite fee, within a period of three months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE csl
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23000/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE DEED DATED 09-10-1986
Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 04-04-2022
Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 29-06-2022
Exhibit-P4 PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE PRESENT LIE AND NATURE OF THE LAND
Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM 6 DATED 02-07-2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!