Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tgn Kumar vs The Director General Bureau Of ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 909 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 909 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2023

Kerala High Court
Tgn Kumar vs The Director General Bureau Of ... on 17 January, 2023
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
     TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 27TH POUSHA, 1944
                        WP(C) NO. 14993 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:

          TGN KUMAR
          33/3004, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-682028.

          BY ADV M.R.NANDAKUMAR



RESPONDENT/S:

    1     THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY
          "A WING", I-IIII FLOOR, JANPATH BHAWAN, JANPATH, NEW
          DELHI-110001.

    2     THE DIRECTOR GENERAL,
          CISF, BLOCK NO.13-CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD, JAWAHARLAL
          NEHRU STADIUM MARG, PRAGATI VIHAR, NEW DELHI, DELHI-
          110003.

    3     THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
          BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE
          REGIONAL, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY,
          TRIVANDRUM NEAR DOMESTIC TERMINAL, TRIVANDRUM
          SANGHUMUGHAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-6950085.

    4     THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
          COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., REP. BY ITS
          CHAIRMAN, HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT
          SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

    5     THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
          COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., NEDUMBASSERY, KOCHI-
          683111.

    6     ACK NAIR,
          AIRPORT DIRECTOR, COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.,
          NEDUMBASSERY, KOCHI-683111.
 WP(C) NO. 14993 OF 2021 and conctd. Cases
                                 2

     7       SHABEER,
             EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, (ENGINEERING), COCHIN
             INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., NEDUMBASSERY, KOCHI-
             683111.

          BY ADVS.
          S.KRISHNA
          P.BENNY THOMAS
          D.PREM KAMATH
          TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL)
          ABEL TOM BENNY
          JYOTHISH KRISHNA
          AHAMMAD SACHIN K.
          KURIAN OOMMEN THERAKATH
          JAIKRISHNAN.M.PISHARODI




      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   17.01.2023,   THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 14993 OF 2021 and conctd. Cases
                                  3

                             JUDGMENT

The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayers:

I. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or directions directing the respondents 1 to 3 to pass requisite orders refraining respondents 6 and 7 from entering CIAL in their capacity as Airport Director and Executive Director respectively, and without mandatory pass.

II. Issue a Writ of mandamus commanding the 1st and 2nd respondents to pass appropriate orders, ordering an enquiry on the grievances highlighted in Ext.P2 forthwith.

2. In compliance of the order of this Court dated 16.1.2023,

an affidavit of Sri. Saji K George, Company Secretary has been

filed. Copy thereof has been given to the counsel for the petitioner.

Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the counter affidavit read thus:

3. It is submitted that the 7th respondent was working as Executive Director (Engineering Service) of Cochin International Airport Ltd. He was in the payroll of the CIAL for a period of 24 years heading Civil Engineering Dept. After his retirement he was re-engaged on fixed term contract basis as Executive Director (Engineering Services) in CIAL with effect from 1.8.2020.

4. It is submitted that the 7th respondent's contract which was last renewed with effect from 15.11.2022 has been expired on 14.1.2023. The 7th respondent ceases to be the Executive Director of the CIAL with effect from 14.1.2023 (AN) and the management has decided not to extend/renew his contract with effect from 14.1.2023 (AN).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there

is a defiance to the directions of this Court with regard to not

engagement of the 7th respondent in future. WP(C) NO. 14993 OF 2021 and conctd. Cases

4. At this stage, counsel for the respondent submitted that

the 7th respondent will not be re-engaged on contract basis in

future, after cessation of employment. In view of the undertaking

given by the respondents, writ petition stands closed with a liberty

to the petitioner to revive the matter.

Sd/-

sab                                        AMIT RAWAL
                                              JUDGE

WP(C) NO. 14993 OF 2021 and conctd. Cases

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14993/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 01.07.2021.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITH COPY OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 09.07.2021.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter