Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1764 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 12TH MAGHA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 437 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC NO.285/2019 OF JUDICIAL FIRST
CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, VAIKOM
PETITIONER:
AUGUSTIN KURUVILA,
AGED 22 YEARS,
S/O.KURUVILA,
AARACKAL HOUSE,
KEEZHOOR POST,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 605.
BY ADV SRINATH C.V.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.
2 YEDHUKRISHNAN,
AGED 24 YEARS,
S/O.SURESH, KOTTARATHIL HOUSE,
CHEMPU P.O, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 608.
3 ARUN SHAJI,
AGED 25 YEARS,
S/O.SHAJI, CHAITHRAM HOUSE, ANGADIKKAL,
VADAKKEMURI, ANGADIKKAL POST PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
PIN - 691 555
PP SRI.NOUSHAD K.A, ADV.JOJI ALEX
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC NO.437 OF 2023
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
--------------------------------
Crl.M.C.No.437 of 2023
---------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of February, 2023
ORDER
Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to
quash all proceedings against him.
2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in C.C. No.285 of 2019 on the files
of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vaikom, registered for the
offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 326 r/w Section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2nd respondent is the defacto complainant and
the 3rd respondent is the injured witness.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the
petitioner ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering
the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by
continuing the proceedings.
5. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10
SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High
Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the
victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This CRL.MC NO.437 OF 2023
view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of
Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and
Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].
6. I have perused Annexure-B and Annexure-C affidavits filed by
respondents 2 and 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that
upon verification, it is understood that the affidavits are genuine, and
the defacto complainant and the other deponent stand by the contents
thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public
interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the
prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an
exercise in futility.
7. Accordingly, all proceedings as against the petitioner in
C.C. No.285 of 2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate
Court, Vaikom are quashed.
This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE ak CRL.MC NO.437 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 437/2023
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
Annexure A A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET SUBMITTED BY THE VELLOOR POLICE BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, VAIKOM IN CRIME NO. 962/2018.
Annexure B AN AFFIDAVIT OF THE RESPONDENT NO 2.
DATED 05/1/2023.
Annexure C AN AFFIDAVIT OF THE RESPONDENT NO 3.
DATED 05/1/2023.
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES:-NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!