Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarun.P.Unni vs State Of Kerala
2023 Latest Caselaw 13525 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13525 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2023

Kerala High Court

Sarun.P.Unni vs State Of Kerala on 21 December, 2023

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA,
                                    1945
                       OP(CRL.) NO. 964 OF 2023
   AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CRA 135/2023 OF ADDITIONAL
  DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - III, ALAPPUZHA / III
                      ADDITIONAL MACT, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/S:

         SARUN.P.UNNI, AGED 32 YEARS
         S/O. P.K.UNNI, PUTHENPARAMBIL, KUZHIMATTAM.P.O,
         KOTTAYAM, PIN - 688533
         BY ADVS.
         R.REJI
         M.V.THAMBAN
         THARA THAMBAN
         B.BIPIN
         ARUN BOSE
         JEENA A.V.
         THOMAS THOMAS
RESPONDENT/S:
    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
          OF KERALA,, PIN - 682031
    2     JOHNY.P.P, AGED 42 YEARS
          S/O. PETER, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, POLLETHAI.P.O,
          ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688522
          BY ADVS.
          B.PRAMOD
          BIJU VIGNESWAR(KAR/171/1998)
OTHER PRESENT:
          SRI HRITHWIK C.S., PP
     THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.12.2023,     THE    COURT   ON    THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                         -2-
O.P.(Crl.)No. 964 of 2023



                                P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                               ======================================================

                                   O.P.(Crl.)No. 964 of 2023
                            =============================================================

                    Dated this the 21st day of December, 2023

                                             JUDGMENT

The above original petition is filed with following prayers:

"(i) To call for the records leading to Exhibit P2 order and set aside that portion of Exhibit P2 order to the extent which direct the petitioner/ appellant to deposit 20% of the fine amount for suspending the execution of the sentence upon the accused as per Exhibit P1 judgment.

(ii) to issue such other further reliefs as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case. " (sic)

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P2 order by which he is

directed to deposit 20% of the find amount imposed by the trial court

as per Ext.P1 judgment invoking the powers under Section 148 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act for short).

3. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the Judicial

First Class Magistrate Court, Alappuzha in CC No.182 of 2020 under

Section 138 of NI Act. He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment

till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs.5,18,000/-.

Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, the petitioner filed an

appeal before the Sessions Court, Alappuzha. The Additional Sessions

Judge-III, Alappuzha considered the appeal and passed an order in the

suspension petition filed along with the appeal as evident by Ext.P2.

In Ext.P2, the learned Sessions Judge directed the petitioner to deposit

20% of the fine amount before the trial court, in the light of Section

148(1) of the NI Act. Hence, this original petition is filed.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the public prosecutor. I

also heard the counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.

5. After hearing both sides and also considering the dictum laid

down by this Court in Baiju v. State of Kerala [2023 KHC Online

829], I think the impugned order is to be set aside. While imposing

the direction to deposit the amount under Section 148 of the NI Act,

the Sessions Judge has not considered the matter in detail. It is not a

speaking order. In the light of the principle laid down by this Court in

Baiju's case (supra) a speaking order is necessary. Therefore, that

part of Ext.P2 order is to be set aside.

Therefore, this Original Petition is allowed in the following

manner:

1. Ext.P2 order to the extent it directs to deposit 20% of the fine amount before the trial court as per section 148 (1) of the NI Act, alone is set aside. The Additional Sessions Judge-III, Alappuzha is directed to reconsider the same, in the light of the principle laid down by this Court in Baiju's case (supra).

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das

APPENDIX OF OP(CRL.) 964/2023

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.06.2023 IN C.C. NO. 182/2020 OF THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ALAPPUZHA Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2023 IN CRL.M.P NO. 3492/2023 IN CRL. APPEAL NO. 135/2023 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE SESSIONS JUDGE-III, ALAPPUZHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter