Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Peter Jose @Prince vs Yohannan @ Honai
2023 Latest Caselaw 12845 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12845 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2023

Kerala High Court

Peter Jose @Prince vs Yohannan @ Honai on 8 December, 2023

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
   FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
                       CRL.MC NO. 9167 OF 2023
   CRIME NO.172/2023 OF Mulanthuruthy Police Station, Ernakulam
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 311/2023 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
                      MAGISTRATE COURT, PIRAVOM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

          PETER JOSE @PRINCE
          AGED 47 YEARS
          PALAL HOUSE, PULIKYAMALI KARA, MULANTHURUTHY ERNAKULAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 682314
          BY ADV P.VIPIN KUMAR


RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

    1     YOHANNAN @ HONAI
          AGED 56 YEARS
          NJARAKKATTILL HOUSE, THALPANA KARA, MULANTHURUTHY
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682314
    2     BEENA
          AGED 50 YEARS
          W/O YOHANNAN NJARAKKATTILL HOUSE, THALPANA KARA,
          MULANTHURUTHY ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682314
    3     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          PIN - 682031



          SRI NOUSHAD K.A. (SR PP) /
          SRI BINU B. SAMUEL (FOR RESPONDENT)


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 9167 OF 2023                  2



                                 ORDER

Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.172/2023 of

Mulanthuruthy Police Station, Ernakulam District, alleging

commission of offences under Sections 447, 323, 509 of the

Indian Penal Code. The matter is now pending as C.C.

No.311/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate

Court, Piravom.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would

submit that the entire issues between the petitioner and

respondent Nos.1 and 2 have been settled. Learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner also refers to Annexures 4 and 5

affidavits executed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 to establish that

the entire issues between the petitioner and respondent Nos.1

and 2 have been settled and respondent Nos.1 and 2 do not intend

to continue with the proceedings against the petitioner.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel

appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 would confirm that the

entire issues between the petitioner and respondent Nos.1 and 2

have been settled and respondent Nos.1 and 2 do not wish to

continue with the prosecution in any manner.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,

the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for

respondent Nos.1 and 2, I am of the view that this is fit case

where the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of

Cr.P.C. can be invoked to quash the proceedings against the

petitioner on the ground of settlement. The principles

governing the circumstances in which this Court can exercise

the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C to quash

criminal proceedings in respect of non-compoundable offences

are delineated by the judgments of the Supreme Court in Gian

Singh V. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and State

of Madhya Pradesh V. Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019)

5 SCC 688]. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid

judgments that offences of heinous nature cannot be quashed

on the ground of subsequent settlement. Here, the nature of

the offences does not compel me to hold that the proceedings

cannot be quashed on the ground of settlement. No public

interest will be served by continuing with the proceedings

against the petitioner. It is unlikely that the State will be able

to successfully prosecute the case against the petitioner. In

that view of the matter, I am of the view that this is fit case

where the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of

Cr.P.C. can be invoked to quash the proceedings against the

petitioner on the ground of settlement.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is allowed and all further

proceedings in C.C. No.311/2023 on the file of the Judicial First

Class Magistrate Court, Piravom (arising out of Crime

No.172/2023 of Mulanthuruthy Police Station, Ernakulam

District), will stand quashed as against the petitioner.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt

PETITIONER ANNEXURES AnnexureA1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I. STATEMENT IN CRIME NO. 172/2023 OF MULANTHURUTHY POLICE STATION AnnexureA2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO.

172/2023 OF MULANTHURUTHY POLICE STATION AnnexureA3 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C NO. 311/2023 OF THE JFCM COURT, PIRAVOM Annexure4 AN AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE RESPONDENT NO 1 AnnexureA5 AN AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE RESPONDENT NO 2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter