Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anitta Alex vs Mathews P Cherry
2023 Latest Caselaw 8533 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8533 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023

Kerala High Court
Anitta Alex vs Mathews P Cherry on 7 August, 2023
Mat.Appeal.No.133 of 2023
                                  1

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
                                  &
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
    MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1945
                      MAT.APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2023
 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 604/2021 OF FAMILY COURT,
                               KOTTAYAM
APPELLANT/IST RESPONDENT:

            ANITTA ALEX,AGED 29 YEARS,
            D/O.ALEX THAYIL,
            RESIDING AT THAYIL HOUSE,
            MANJOOR P.O., KURUPPANTHARA,
            KADUTHURUTHY VILLAGE,
            VAIKOM TALUK,
            KOTTAYAM., PIN - 686603
            BY ADVS.
            PAUL JACOB (P)
            SHERU JOSEPH
            MATHEW THOMAS
            ANAND KRISHNA


RESPONDENTS/ORIGINAL PETITIONER:

     1      MATHEWS P CHERRY, AGED 34,
            S/O.CHERIYACOB P.M.,
            PUTHUSSERY HOUSE,
            KARAYAMPARAMBU,
            KARUKUTTY P.O.,
            KARUKUTTY VILLAGE,
            ALUVA TALUK,
            ERNAKULAM., PIN - 683576
     2      ALEX THAYIL, AGED 66 YEARS,
            RESDING AT THAYIL HOUSE,
            MANJOOR P.O., KURUPPANTHARA,
            KADUTHURUTHY VILLAGE,
            VAIKOM TALUK,
            KOTTAYAM., PIN - 686603
     3      KOCHURANI ALEX, AGED 62 YEARS,
 Mat.Appeal.No.133 of 2023
                                    2

             RESIDING AT THAYIL HOUSE,
             MANJOOR P.O., KURUPPANTHARA,
             KADUTHURUTHY VILLAGE,
             VAIKOM TALUK,
             KOTTAYAM., PIN - 686603
             BY ADVS.
             MEGHA K.XAVIER
             C.A.LINCY(K/675/2000)



      THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.08.2023,      THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 Mat.Appeal.No.133 of 2023
                                            3


       A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JJ
          ------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Mat.Appeal.No.133 of 2023
                       --------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 7th day of August, 2023


                                   JUDGMENT

A.Muhamed Mustaque.J

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment in OP

No.604 of 2021 on the file of the Family Court, Ettumanoor. The

mother is before us. The dispute is with regard to the custody of the

minor child born in the wedlock between the parties herein. The

family court, in an application filed by the father allowed the custody

of the child to the father. The relevant portion of the said order reads

thus:-

"(1) The petition is allowed (2) The petition to hand over the custody of the minor Cherian Mathew is dismissed.

(3) The petitioner is entitled to have the custody of the minor during every Saturday and Sunday between 10 a.m. on Saturday and 5 p.m. on Sunday.

(4) The petitioner shall take the child from the residence of the 1st respondent at 10 a.m. on Saturday and bring the child to the residence of the 1st respondent at 5 p.m on Sunday. (5) The respondents are restrained by way of a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from taking the child out of Kerala without the consent of the petitioner. (6) The parties are to bear their respective costs."

2. As is seen from the impugned judgment itself, the mother

did not file any objection and there was no occasion for the family Mat.Appeal.No.133 of 2023

court to advert to the objection raised by the mother. No doubt, the

family court has to bestow its attention to the welfare of the child

while passing such orders. It would be ideal that the mother is also

given an opportunity to raise an objection. It may be true that there

were laches on the part of the mother in raising objection. We note

that there are pending cases between the parties.

3. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, we are of the

view that an opportunity should be given to the mother to raise

objection by way of reconsideration of the matter afresh, and after

affording both the parties an opportunity to adduce evidence.

Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and remanded the matter

back for fresh consideration. This matter shall also be tagged along

with the pending matters between the parties. However, till further

orders are passed, we allow the father to have the custody of the child

on 1st and 3rd Friday evening of every month till the following Sunday,

5 p.m. We also allow the father to have a custody of the child from

31.8.2023 at 10.am. till 2.9.2023 at 5.30 p.m. The child shall be

handed over and returned from the residence of the mother.

The Mat.Appeal is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE , JUDGE

Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS.C.P., JUDGE dlk 7.8.2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter