Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5476 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 8TH VAISAKHA, 1945
WA NO. 858 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 41651/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT:
DR. USHA UMESH
AGED 58 YEARS
W/O. SRJ. R. UMESH CHANDRAN, 5/241D, ADARSH NAGAR,
YMCA ROAD PIPE LINE JUNCTION, COCHIN-682022 NOW RESIDING AT
9F, TRINITY HIGH GROW MODEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE ROAD
THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI, PIN - 682021
BY ADVS.
GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL
T.S.RAJASENAN
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & 2ND RESPONDENT:
1 ALKARSF APPARELS PRIVATE LIMITED
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 44/1514, KOCHAR ROAD,
NEAR HEERA HERITAGE JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
REPRESENTED BY S.R. SREEJITH, MANAGING DIRECTOR,
PIN - 695014
2 S.R. SREEJITH
S/O. SRIDHARAN NAIR, SRJNILAYAM PUNNAMOODU, PALLICHAL (P.O)
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695020
3 THE KERALA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED (KINFRA), KINFRA HOUSE, TC NO. 31/2312,
SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010
BY ADVS. K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN
ADV. P U SHAILAJAN
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.04.2023, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.A No.858 of 2023
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, C. JAYACHANDRAN, JJ.
==============================
W.A. No.858 of 2023
==============================
Dated this the 28th day of April, 2023
JUDGMENT
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
By the impugned judgment dated 04.04.2023
in W.P.(C.)No.41651 of 2022, learned Single Judge
directed the Kerala Industrial Infrastructure
Development Corporation Ltd., to take a decision on
execution of lease in favour of the first petitioner
after considering the claims raised by the
petitioners for executing such a lease. The
judgment also directed that the orders so issued,
will be subject to the result of the proceedings in
the suit C.S.No.18 of 2021 pending before the
Commercial Court, Thiruvananthapuram.
2. Appellant was the first respondent before
the learned Single Judge. She did not appear,
despite service of notice. Though appellant now W.A No.858 of 2023
contends that she could not appear due to
circumstances beyond her control, we do not intend
to record a finding to that effect, taking into
reckoning the nature of the order that we propose
to issue.
3. The learned Single Judge has only directed
a decision to be taken by the second respondent
based upon the claims raised by the petitioners for
executing the lease. Though a direction to hear the
appellant has not been specifically directed, we
deem it that the principles of natural justice require
the appellant also to be heard by the second
respondent, before such a decision is taken.
4. In the above circumstances, we dispose of
the Writ Appeal, modifying the judgment of the
learned Single Judge to the limited extent of
granting an opportunity of hearing to the appellant
also, before a decision, as directed by the learned
Single Judge is taken. The decision so directed, shall W.A No.858 of 2023
be taken without delay and as expeditiously as
possible.
The Writ Appeal is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
Sd/-
C. JAYACHANDRAN
JUDGE
NB/-28-4 W.A No.858 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WA 858/2023
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE: NIL RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE: NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!