Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10135 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 24TH BHADRA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 6212 OF 2022
Crime No.765 of 2022 of Chithara Police Station
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1, 3 & 4:
1 SUBIN S, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O SURESH,
SV HOUSE, KARARA,CHITHARA PO, CHITHARA VILLAGE,
MADATHARA,PIN-691559
2 SARATHLAL M V, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O MOHANAN
PARAVILA VEEDU, KARARA, CHITHARA PO, MADATHARA
CHITHARA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, PIN-691559
3 ASHOK, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN
PARAVILA VEEDU, KARARA, CHITHARA PO
MADATHARA CHITHARA VILLAGE KOTTARAKKARA TALUK,
PIN-691559
BY ADVS.
C.R.SIVAKUMAR
BINI.K
MINI.M.NAIR
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERANAKULAM.PIN-
682031
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
CHITHARA POLICE STATION KOLLAM (DIST),
PIN-691559
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.09.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BA No.6212 of 2022 2
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
.................................................................
B.A.No. 6212 of 2022
.................................................................
Dated this the 15th day of September, 2022
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail.
2. The petitioners are accused Nos. 1, 3 and 4 in Crime
No.765 of 2022 of Chithara Police Station registered alleging
commission of offence punishable under Section 379 of Indian Penal
Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioners is that they have cut
and removed three Teak wood trees standing in the puramboke land.
4. Petitioners rely on Annexure-A2 (details available in the
website regarding the land in Block No.55, Sy. No. 313/3 Chithara
Village) to show that the said land is not a puramboke land, but belongs
to a private party and therefore the allegation against the petitioners are
false.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application for bail
mainly contending that the mistake in this regard has been rectified by
proceedings of the Tahsildar as early as in 2011 and a portion of the
property has been shown as puramboke land and it is true that the
corresponding changes have not been made in the website. The learned
Public Prosecutor submits that though the 1st petitioner is involved in
other crimes, no criminal antecedents are seen reported as against
petitioners 2 and 3. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that the
alleged teak wood trees have already been recovered and that limited
custody may be granted.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the
case and the nature of the allegations, I am inclined to grant pre-arrest
bail to the petitioners on conditions.
Therefore, the bail application is disposed of with the
following directions. The petitioners shall surrender before the
investigating officer in Crime No.765 of 2022 of Chithara Police Station
on 20.09.2022 and make themselves available for interrogation on that
day or on any other day or days as directed by the investigating officer.
In the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with Crime No.765
of 2022 of Chithara Police Station, they shall be produced before the
jurisdictional Magistrate on the very same day and shall be released on
bail on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/-
(Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties
each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional
Court.
(ii) They shall appear before the investigating officer on all
Saturdays at 11.00 a.m. till the filing of final report.
(iii) They shall not tamper with any evidence;
(iv) They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any witness acquainted with the facts of
the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts
to the court or to any police officer;
(v) They shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the
Investigating Officer in the abovesaid crime may file an application
before jurisdictional court for cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that it is within the power of the police to
investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries on the
information if any given by the petitioners even when the petitioners are
on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Sushila Aggarwal and
others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another (2020 (1) KHC 663).
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE
cks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!