Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3256 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 27398 OF 2015
PETITIONER:
REHIM
AGED 45 YEARS
S/O.ABDUL MAJEED, KANNAMBA VEEDU, THEKKUMBHAGAM, SOUTH
PARAVOOR, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.
SRI.BINU GEORGE
SMT.HEMALATHA
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
SECRETARTY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2 PARAVOOR MUNCIPALITY
SOUTH PARAVOOR, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY - 691 301.
3 IRSHAD
S/O.MOOSA, PANAN THODIYIL, THEKKUM BHAGAM, SOUTH
PARAVOOR, KOLLAM - 691 322.
4 NAJEEB
S/O.ASANARU KUNJU, CHUNKANAZHIKAM, THEKKUM BHAGAM,
SOUTH PARAVOOR, KOLLAM - 691 322.
5 ANSAR
S/O.ALIYAR, NEAR MALAPPURAM PALLI, THEKKUMBHAGAM, SOUTH
PARAVOOR, KOLLAM - 691 322.
6 REHIM
S/O.MUHAMMED SALI KURANDIKULAM, THEKKUM BHAGAM, SOUTH
PARAVOOR, KOLLAM - 691 322.
BY ADV SRI.S.SREEKUMAR KOLLAM
R1 - SRI.JOBY JOSEPH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.03.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No. 27398/2015 :2:
Dated this the 18th day of March, 2022.
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to
respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to take effective and immediate steps for
stopping the illegal sale of meat in any place within the limits of South
Paravoor Municipality and also to take appropriate action on Ext. P4
representation submitted before the Secretary of the South Paravoor
Municipality.
2. The basic contention advanced by the petitioner is that he
became a successful bidder in the tender for conducting a meat stall
for the financial year 2015-2016 in South Paravoor Municipality, Kollam
District and as per the conditions in the tender notification, the
petitioner deposited an earnest money of Rs. 8,69,920/- with the
Paravoor Municipality, Kollam District.
3. The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that various illegal
meat stalls conducted by respondent Nos. 3 to 6 are functioning and in
spite of the complaint filed by the petitioner, the Municipality has not
cared to take any action. It is, thus, seeking appropriate directions,
this writ petition is filed.
4. I have perused the pleadings and materials on record.
5. In my considered opinion, the subject issue relates to the
year 2015-2016 and since the period of tender awarded to the
petitioner is already over, I do not think that anything survives to be
considered in this writ petition on merits.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.
Rv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!