Pavithran P.P vs Authorised Officer, Kerala State ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 3254 Ker

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
     FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1943
                        WP(C) NO. 9133 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

          PAVITHRAN P.P.,
          AGED 50 YEARS
          S/O.KORAN, PARAYULLAPARAMBATH, VADAKKE POYILOOR P.O.,
          THRIPPANGOTTUR, KANNUR-670 692.
          BY ADVS.
          ZAKEER HUSSAIN
          K.A.SANJEETHA


RESPONDENTS:

    1     AUTHORISED OFFICER, KERALA STATE CO OP BANK LTD.,
          (FORMERLY KNOWN AS KANNUR DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK),
          KANNUR REGIONAL OFFICE, PARAT, KANNUR-670 693.
    2     KERALA STATE CO OP BANK LTD.,
          (FORMERLY KNOWN AS KANNUR DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK),
          KANNUR REGIONAL OFFICE, PARAT, KANNUR-670 693,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER.
OTHER PRESENT:

          SRI.M.SASINDRAN


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 9133 OF 2022
                               -:2:-


                 BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
             -----------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No. 9133 of 2022
             ----------------------------------------
            Dated this the 18th day of March, 2022

                          JUDGMENT

Petitioner as borrower from the respondent bank, has

committed default in repayment. Consequently, proceedings

have been initiated by the bank for recovery of the amounts

due.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has

confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the

overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation

of the loan account.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent bank

that the petitioner committed default in repayment and the

overdue amount is Rs.4,19,785/-. It was further submitted

that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as

a matter of indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to WP(C) NO. 9133 OF 2022

accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited

instalments and regularise the loan account.

4. I have heard Sri.Zakir Hussain, the learned counsel

for the petitioner as well as Sri.M.Sasindran, the learned

Standing Counsel for the respondents.

5. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and

the situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions

made as recorded above, I am of the view that the

petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the

overdue amount in '18' instalments and thereafter, if the

amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed

above, to have the loan account regularised.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue

amount of Rs.4,19,785/- along with bank charges from the

petitioner and regularise the loan account of the petitioner

on the following conditions:

(i) The overdue amount of Rs.4,19,785/- shall be repaid in '18' equated monthly instalments. WP(C) NO. 9133 OF 2022

(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 18/04/2022.

(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI's along with the instalments directed above.

(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM WP(C) NO. 9133 OF 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9133/2022

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER'S LOAN.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.02.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL

 AJM                     //TRUE COPY//           PA TO JUDGE