Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3188 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 5655 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
JYOTHILAKSHMI
AGED 54 YEARS
W/O. REGHUNATH, CHANGARAMKULATHU HOUSE, NATTIKA P.O.,
CHAVAKKAD , THRISSUR
BY ADV V.A.VINOD
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
CAMP OFFICE, KALYAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 003
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
VALAPPAD POLICE STATION, VALAPPAD , THRISSUR-680 567
3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
VALAPAD POLICE STATION, VALAPAD, THRISSUR-680 567
4 SREEKUMAR,
S/O. GOPINATHA MENON, CHANGARAMKULAM HOUSE, VELI, FORT
KOCHI, ERNAKULAM-682 001
BY ADVS.
A.BALAGOPALAN
A.RAJAGOPALAN
SOJO J.KALLIDUKIL
P.SEENA
BY SMT.PRINCY XAVIER-SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.5655 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 18th day of March, 2022
This writ petition is filed seeking directions
to respondents 1 to 3, to afford adequate and effective
protection to the life and property of the petitioner
and her family members from the 4th respondent.
2. It is submitted in the writ petition that the
petitioner and 4th respondent are siblings and that the
petitioner is in possession of the property and a
residential house situated therein, on the basis of a
'will' executed by their mother. It is submitted that
the 4th respondent is threatening and attacking the
petitioner and the other members of her family and
that the 4th respondent has no right to interfere in the
peaceful possession of the property devolved on the
petitioner. It is on these contentions that the writ
petition was filed. An interim order directing the 3 rd
respondent to afford adequate protection to the life
of the petitioner was passed on 18.02.2022. WP(C).No.5655 OF 2022
3. A detailed counter affidavit has been placed
on record by the 4th respondent. It is contended
therein that the 4th respondent was staying in the
property, which belonged to the mother of the
petitioner and the 4th respondent, along with his wife.
It is submitted that challenging the validity of the will
allegedly executed by their mother, the 4th respondent
has instituted O.S.No.22/2022 before the Sub Court,
Chavakkad and that the right and title to the property
is pending adjudication in the civil suit. It is
submitted that under the guise of the interim order
granted by this Court, the 4th respondent has been
driven out of the portion of the house, where he was
staying along with his wife, who is a cancer patient. It
is submitted that the 4th respondent was not even
allowed to take the medicines or personal effects from
the house.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the partition suit was allegedly filed only on WP(C).No.5655 OF 2022
14.02.2022 and that the 4th respondent had been
threatening and attacking the petitioner and a
complaint in this regard had been submitted, as early
as, on 09.02.2022. It is further submitted that in the
guise of a civil suit instituted, the 4 th respondent
cannot threaten the petitioner or attack her.
5. Having considered the contentions advanced
on either side, I am of the opinion that all the issues
with regard to the title to the property and the
genuineness of the 'will', are matters to be decided by
the competent civil court. This Court can and does
not intend to consider any of such contentions in this
writ petition. The only issue which can be considered
by this Court is with regard to the maintenance of law
and order and any threat to the life of the petitioner
and her family from the 4th respondent. However, no
undue advantage can be taken by the petitioner on
account of an interim order of police protection
granted by this Court, which does not state anything WP(C).No.5655 OF 2022
about the rights of the parties on their title to the
property in question.
In the above view of the matter, this writ
petition is disposed of directing that in case there is
any law and order situation, the SHO shall take
appropriate steps to see that law and order is
maintained. In case of any attack or threat from the
4th respondent or anybody claiming through him, the
petitioner may inform the 3rd respondent, who shall
afford adequate protection to the life of the petitioner.
However, it is made clear that the order of protection
to life passed by this Court will have absolutely no
bearing on the property dispute between the parties
which will be decided in accordance with law,
independently.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE SSK/18/03 WP(C).No.5655 OF 2022
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
TRUE COPY OF THE WILL NO.94/2007 OF SRO Exhibit P1 THRIPRAYAR TRUE COPY OF THE RATION CARD Exhibit P2 NO.1844151914 OF THE PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE Exhibit P3 PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.02.2022 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING Exhibit P4 ACCEPTANCE OF EXT P3 DATED 16.02.2022
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS 22/2022 Exhibit R4 a FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD.
THE TRUE COPY OF AADHAAR CARD OF THE 4TH Exhibit R4 B RESPONDENT.
TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION IDENTITY CARD O Exhibit R4 C THE 4TH RESPONDENT'S WIFE TRUE COPY OF THE TELEPHONE BILL OF THE Exhibit R4 D 4TH RESPONDENT.
TRUE COPY OF THE HOSPITAL RECORDS OF THE Exhibit R4 E WIFE OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT OBTAINED FROM LAKSHORE HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 9/2/2022 Exhibit R4 F FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT AT THE VALAPAD POLICE STATION.
TRUE COPY OF THE POLICE COMPLAINT DATED Exhibit R1 G 9.2.2022
SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!