Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Oommen K. Abraham vs Serious Frauds Investigation ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 3093 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3093 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2022

Kerala High Court
Oommen K. Abraham vs Serious Frauds Investigation ... on 17 March, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
         Thursday, the 17th day of March 2022 / 26th Phalguna, 1943
                       W.P.(C) NO. 12258 OF 2021 (F)
PETITIONERS:

  1. OOMMEN K. ABRAHAM, MINRA-202, KANICHUKATT, MAR IVANIOS NAGAR LANE-2,
     KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM P.O., TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695 004 AND 3 OTHERS

RESPONDENTS:

  1. SERIOUS FRAUDS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, 2ND FLOOR, PT. DEENDAYAL
     ANTYODAYA BHAWAN, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110 003
     AND 2 OTHERS


     Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to file interim reports
regarding the investigation being conducted pursuant to Exhibit P2
judgment of this Honorable Court in accordance with the law laid down
under Sections 212(11) and 223(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.


     This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition
and the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and this Court's order dated
04.02.2022 and upon hearing the arguments of SRI.PRAVEEN VYASAN, Advocate
for the petitioners and the CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL for the respondent
1 &2, the court passed the following:


                                                                  [P.T.O.]
                            N. NAGARESH, J.
         -----------------------------------------------------------
        W.P.(C) Nos.28019/2020, 199 & 12258 of 2021
                                   and
                W.P.(Crl.) Nos. 17 & 122 of 2022
         -----------------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 17th day of March, 2022


                               ORDER

The learned counsel representing the petitioners,

relying on Section 212(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, point out

that if any case has been assigned to the Serious Frauds

Investigation Office (SFIO) for investigation under this Act, no

other investigating agency of Central Government or any State

Government shall proceed with investigation in such case in

respect of any offence under the Companies Act and in case any

such investigation has already been initiated, it shall not be

proceeded further with and the concerned agency shall transfer

the relevant documents and records in respect of such offences

under this Act to Serious Fraud Investigation Office. In view of

Section 213(17)(a), in case SFIO is investigating any offence, W.P.(C) Nos.28019/2020, 199 & 12258 of 2021 and W.P.(Crl.) Nos. 17 & 122 of 2022

any other agency having any information or documents

provide the same to the SFIO.

2. In view of such over riding powers given to the

SFIO, the SFIO is bound to proceed with the investigation

with vigour, taking over all requisite documents from various

investigation authorities.

3. The petitioners pointed out that there are more

than 30,000 citizens, who have defrauded by the Group of

Companies under investigation. The amounts involved in

the fraud is more than ₹1600 Crores. As many as 34

investors have committed suicide due to loss of their life long

earnings. The Group of Companies had 239 branches,

which are all shut down now, but the manager who run those

branches are freely available in the society for examination

and investigation, contend the petitioners.

4. Taking into account the magnitude of the offence

and the disastrous impact thereon over the hapless W.P.(C) Nos.28019/2020, 199 & 12258 of 2021 and W.P.(Crl.) Nos. 17 & 122 of 2022

investors, this Court is of the view that investigation should

be proceeded with vigourously. According to the petitioners,

the Chairman and Managing Directors of the Companies,

who were in Australia have returned to India and are at

present residing in India.

5. In the afore facts, the Standing Counsel for the

SFIO is required to file a statement before this Court

explaining the concrete steps taken and effected by the

SFIO during the last three months in the matter of

investigation. The statement should also contain the status

as regard the forensic audit contemplated under Section 211

of the Act, 2013.

Post on 07.04.2022.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR

17-03-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter