Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.S.Jeejimol vs Export Inspection Council Of ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 7580 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7580 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
K.S.Jeejimol vs Export Inspection Council Of ... on 24 June, 2022
WP(C) No.9590/2022                            1/4

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                           PRESENT
                          THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
                     Friday, the 24th day of June 2022 / 3rd Ashadha, 1944
                                     WP(C) NO. 9590 OF 2022
   PETITIONER:

          K.S.JEEJIMOL, AGED 57 YEARS, D/O.K.A.SREEDHARAN, JUNIOR HINDI
          TRANSLATOR, EXPORT INSPECTION AGENCY, KOCHI-682 011, RESIDING AT
          'ARYA NIVAS', VADUTHALA P.O., KOCHI-682 023

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,
         (INSPECTOR & QUALITY CONTROL), 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK I, COMMERCIAL
         COMPLEX, EAST KIDWAI NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110 023
      2. EXPORT INSPECTION AGENCY, REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT DIRECTOR,
         SHIPYARD QUARTERS ROAD, PANAMPILLY NAGAR SOUTH, KOCHI-682 036
      3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
         MINISTRY OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY, UDYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 001
      4. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF OFFICIAL
         LANGUAGE, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET,
         NEW DELHI 110 003


        Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to direct the Respondents to pay the Salary of the Petitioner with
   Grade pay of Rs.5400/- on MACP Upgradation provisionally, subject to the
   outcome of this Writ Petition, in the interest of justice.


        This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and
   the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
   M/S.P.V.SALEEM & SHAFIK M.ABDULKHADIR, Advocates for the petitioner and of
   ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA for R1 to R4, the court passed the
   following:
 WP(C) No.9590/2022                         2/4




                                   ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
                           =========================
                                W.P.(C) No.9590 of 2022
                           =========================
                            Dated this the 24th day of June, 2022

                                         ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned CGC appearing for the respondents.

2. The preliminary contentions raised by the

learned CGC that the issue raised in this writ petition can be

considered only after the consideration of the writ appeal

filed against Ext.P10 judgment. I notice that what was

decided in Ext.P10 was with regard to the reduction effected

in the pay of the petitioner from the scale of Rs.5,000-

8,000/- to Rs.4,600-7,000/-. The said issue is said to be

pending in an appeal. The prayer in this writ petition is with

regard to the entitlement of the petitioner to the grant of

scale of pay of Rs.5,500-9,000/- as Hindi Translator and for

corresponding revision of pay and financial accommodations.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends

that the petitioner, who is a Hindi Translator working in an

autonomous body is entitled to equivalent pay on the WP(C) No.9590/2022 3/4

strength of the Government orders and office memoranda

produced along with the writ petition as Exts.P8, P9 and

P15.

4. Having considered the contentions advanced, I

am of the opinion that since the prayer in this writ petition is

specifically for equivalency in the matter of pay scale as

covered by the office memoranda, the consideration of this

case does not have to await the resolution of the issue

raised in WA 809/2017 which is separate and distinct.

In the above view of the matter, the issue of

maintainability is found in favour of the petitioner. The

respondents shall place a counter affidavit on record with

regard to the contentions on merits.

Post on 5/7/2022.

Sd/-

                                                            ANU SIVARAMAN
                ska                                              JUDGE




24-06-2022                          /True Copy/                      Assistant Registrar
 WP(C) No.9590/2022                 4/4

                      APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9590/2022
Exhibit P8           TRUE COPY OF THE O.M.F.NO.1/1/2008-IC DATED 24.11.2008

ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE , MINISTRY OF FINANCE

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE CORRIGENDUM F.NO.1/1/2008-IC DATED 27.11.2008 ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE WITH TYPED COPY

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.1.2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.17363/2005

Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF THE O.M.F.NO.13035/01/2013-O.L (POLICY) DATED 16.2.2016 ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES , MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter