Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Subash vs Nandakumar
2022 Latest Caselaw 7454 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7454 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Subash vs Nandakumar on 24 June, 2022
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                               &
           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
  FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1944
                    OP (RC) NO. 115 OF 2022
SPEEDY DISPOSAL OF R.C.A.NO.31 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THE
RENT CONTROL APPELLLATE AUTHORITY (ADDITIONAL DISTIRCT &
 SESSIONS COURT-IV), THRISSUR AGAINST E.P.NO.544 OF 2018
  IN R.C.P.NO.36 OF 2016 OF THE RENT CONTROL (MUNSIFF)
                       COURT, CHAVAKKAD


PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DECREE HOLDERS/PETITIONERS:

    1      SUBASH, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY,
           KANJIRAPARAMBIL, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE AND
           DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
           PIN - 680681

    2      LASITHA, AGED 51 YEARS, W/O.SUBASH,
           KANJIRAPARAMBIL, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE AND
           DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
           PIN - 680681

            BY ADV SUMODH MADHAVAN NAIR


RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/RESPONDENT:

           NANDAKUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.SAHADEVAN,
           AALAKKAL, NATTIKA VILLAGE AND DESOM,
           (FEATHER TOUCH POLY JUNCTION), TRIPRAYAR,
           THRISSUR, PIN - 680567


        THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 24.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                               -2-
O.P.(RC)No.115 of 2022



                          JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The appellants filed R.C.P.No.36 of 2016 before the Rent

Control Court (Munsiff), Chavakkad, under Sections 11(2)(b)

and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)

Act, 1965, seeking eviction of the respondent herein-tenant

from the petition schedule shop room. In the said Rent Control

Petition, the Rent Control Court passed Ext.P1 order dated

11.09.2018, invoking its powers under Section 12(3) of the

Act, whereby, the tenant is directed to surrender vacant

possession of the petition schedule shop room to the landlords

within one month from the date of that order, failing which,

the landlords are at liberty to execute the said order through

the process of court. The landlords filed E.P.No.544 of 2018

before the Munsiff's Court, Chavakkad for executing Ext.P1

order. Challenging Ext.P1 order of eviction dated 11.09.2018

passed by the Rent Control Court in R.C.P.No.36 of 2016, the

tenant filed R.C.A.No.31 of 2018 before the Rent Control

Appellate Authority (IVth Additional District & Sessions Judge),

Thrissur, invoking the provisions under Section 18(1)(b) of the

O.P.(RC)No.115 of 2022

Act. The said appeal is now pending consideration before the

Appellate Authority. The grievance of the petitioners in this

original petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India, is the delay in disposal of R.C.A.No.31 of 2018 filed by

the respondent-tenant.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners-

landlords. Considering the nature of relief proposed to be

granted, service of notice on the respondent-tenant is

dispensed with.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners-landlords

would point out that in view of the order of stay granted by

the Appellate Authority in R.C.A.No.31 of 2018, E.P.No.544 of

2018 filed by the landlords for executing Ext.P1 order of

eviction in R.C.P.No.36 of 2016 is kept pending. Therefore,

time bound consideration of the aforesaid appeal is highly

essential.

Having considered the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the petitioners-landlords, this original petition is

disposed of by directing the Rent Control Appellate Authority

(IVth Additional District & Sessions Judge), Thrissur, to finally

O.P.(RC)No.115 of 2022

dispose of R.C.A.No.31 of 2018, as expeditiously as possible,

at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of

production of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE

AV/27/6

O.P.(RC)No.115 of 2022

APPENDIX OF OP (RC) 115/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11/9/2018 AND PASSED BY THE RENT CONTROLLER, RENT CONTROL COURT OF CHAVAKKAD, IN R.C.P. 36/2016

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION NUMBERED AS E.P. 544/2018 AND PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHAVAKKAD ON 5/11/2018 AND UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 35 C.P.C.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL NUMBERED AS R.C.A. 31/2018 PREFERRED BEFORE THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THRISSUR UNDER SECTION 18(1)(b) OF THE KERALA BUILDINGS (LEASE AND RENT CONTROL)ACT, 1965 AND DATED 11/10/2018

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter