Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6512 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 18TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 14528 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
SYAM KUMAR
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O.NANDAN, PANACHIPARA HOUSE, KUDAMURUTTTY P.O.,
R.PERUNAD, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 711.
BY ADV E.V.MOLY
RESPONDENT:
STATE BANK OF INDIA SBI
RASMEC, 1ST FLOOR, KACHANATHU TOWER, KUMBAZHA P.O.,
PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 653, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED
OFFICER.
BY ADV SANTHOSH MATHEW
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P (C) No.14528/2022 -2-
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court challenging proceedings initiated under
the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest Act (hereinafter referred to as the Securitisation Act) for recovery
of the amounts due upon a loan availed by the petitioner.
2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an
opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain
regularisation of the loan account.
3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent bank that the petitioner
committed default in repayment and the overdue amount is Rs.2,37,375/-. It was
further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a
matter of indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to accept repayment of the
overdue amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan account.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the
learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the
situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions made as recorded above and
considering the fact that this is a housing loan and also taking into account the fact
that the petitioner has undertaken to clear off the overdue amount along with
regular EMIs, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to
clear off the overdue amount in ten (10) equal instalments first of which shall be
paid on or before 15-07-2022 and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid
within the time as directed above, to have the loan account regularised.
6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept
repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.2,37,375/- along with bank charges
from the petitioner and regularise the loan account of the petitioner on the
following conditions:
(i) The overdue amount of Rs.2,37,375/- together with any accrued interest and charges shall be repaid in ten equated monthly instalments.
(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 15-07-2022 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on the last working day of every succeeding month.
(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI's along with the instalments directed above.
(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.
(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.
Under no circumstances will any application for extension of
time be entertained.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE AMG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14528/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 31/03/2022 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!