Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gopalan Thayathidavan vs P.K.Sreekumar
2022 Latest Caselaw 6365 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6365 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Gopalan Thayathidavan vs P.K.Sreekumar on 3 June, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
      FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1944
                        CON.CASE(C) NO. 460 OF 2022
               IN ORDER DATED 29.09.2021 IN RP 470/2020
       IN W.P.(C) NO.17061 OF 2012 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

             GOPALAN THAYATHIDAVAN
             AGED 66 YEARS
             S/O. LATE K.V KELU NAIR, PARVATHY BHAVAN, CHERUKUNNU
             P.O., KANNUR DITRICT-670 301, NOW RESIDING AT PURVA
             ETERNITY, E BLOCK, FLAT NO.803, KAKKANAD, NEAR ATHANI
             PALLIKKARA ROAD, P.O.THENGOD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682
             030

             BY ADVS.
             P.M.PAREETH
             AISWARYA VENUGOPAL



RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.3:

             P.K.SREEKUMAR
             CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
             LTD, VIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695
             004



             BY SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN-SC




     THIS    CONTEMPT   OF   COURT    CASE     (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 03.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 Contempt Case(C)NO.460 OF 2022

                                     2


                                 JUDGMENT

Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2022

This contempt of court case is filed alleging non-

compliance of Annexure A1 order.

2. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the

KSEB that after Annexure A1 order, the matter has been

considered, orders passed and the gratuity paid to the petitioner.

In the above view of the matter, in case the petitioner

has any claim for interest, it is open to the petitioner to raise such

claim before the appropriate authority under the Payment of

Gratuity Act, 1972.

With the above observation, the contempt of court case

is closed.

Sd/-

ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE SSK/03/06 Contempt Case(C)NO.460 OF 2022

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Annexure A1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.09.2021 IN RP NO.470/2020

Annexure A2 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05.10.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT

Annexure A3 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2011 IN WPC NO.17061/2012

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter