Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sabu Mon vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 6341 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6341 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Sabu Mon vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 3 June, 2022
Crl.M.C.No.3484/22                    1


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
         FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1944
                        CRL.MC NO. 3484 OF 2022
          CRIME NO.473/2018 OF Chavara Police Station, Kollam
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 359/2013 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS
                       COURT (ADHOC) III, KOLLAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

             SABU MON,
             AGED 43 YEARS,
             S/O.FASALUDDIN, KIZHAKKETHARA HOUSE,
             THAZAVA VILLAGE, KADATHAKUR MURI,
             KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690 518.

             BY ADVS.
             M.R.SASITH
             RAJITHA V.K
             R.K.CHIRUTHA
             BHAVANA K.K
             VISHNUMAYA M.B.
             PREETI S.


RESPONDENTS/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:

     1       THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC
             PROSECUTOR,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERANKULAM, PIN - 682 031.

     2       THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
             CHAVARA POLICE STATION,
             KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 001.

     3       THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
             CHAVARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 001.


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.3484/22                       2


                                ORDER

The petitioner, who is the sole accused in S.C.No.359 of 2013

pending before the 3rd Additional Sessions Court, Kollam, has

approached this Court praying for an order to direct the learned

Sessions Judge to consider the bail application to be submitted by the

petitioner upon his surrender on the same day itself. The

proceedings against the petitioner is now pending as L.P.No.27 of

2018, as he is absconding.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the said

application by pointing out that, as per Annexure-A1 order, this Court

has already shown some indulgence in similar circumstances, in

favour of the petitioner. It is pointed out that on an earlier occasion

also the petitioner approached this Court with the same relief and he

surrendered before the Trial Court consequent to a direction issued

by this Court in this regard. It is pointed out that, the petitioner

violated the terms and conditions of the bail once again and

absconded. In such circumstances, dismissal of this Crl.M.C. is

sought for by the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor

cannot be simply brushed aside. Even though an opportunity was

granted to the petitioner by this Court, the petitioner again evaded

the process of the court. However, as the case is pending since 2013,

it is only proper that the petitioner to be directed to surrender before

the learned Sessions Judge within a time frame and his release can

be considered only on stringent terms and conditions.

4. In my view, taking into account the previous default on the

part of the petitioner, a direction to surrender the passport of the

petitioner shall address the apprehension voiced by the learned

Public Prosecutor.

In such circumstances, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of directing the

petitioner to surrender before the learned Sessions Judge within a

period of two weeks from today and submit the bail application. In

the event of surrender and submission of bail application, the learned

Sessions Judge shall consider the said bail application positively on

the date of surrender itself, provided the petitioner gives prior notice

to the learned Public Prosecutor and also surrender the passport

before the learned Sessions Judge. In order to facilitate the

petitioner to do so, the execution of non-bailable warrant shall be

kept in abeyance for a period of two weeks or till the date of

surrender whichever is earlier.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

                                                 JUDGE
DG/4.6.22



                     APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3484/2022

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1            TRUE COPY OF ORDER IN CRL M C NO
                       7028/2016 OF HONBLE HIGH COURT

Annexure A2            TRUE COPY THE ORDER OF CRL MC NO
                       5511/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter