Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6317 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 11 OF 2022
CRIME NO.47/2009 OF Puthenvelikkara Police Station, Ernakulam
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 407/2016 OF JUDL. FIRST CLASS
MAGISTRATE COURT,NORTH PARAVUR (TEMPORARY)
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 5:
1 JOHNSON,
AGED 44 YEARS
S/O.VARUTHUKUTTY, PUTHEN VEETTIL, THIRUMUKKULAM
VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PINCODE-680 734.
2 SIVADASAN,
AGED 33 YEARS
S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, THOPPIL VEETTIL, MADATHUMPADY VILLAGE,
THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 733.
3 SANISH,
AGED 31 YEARS
S/O.SASI, THATTRUPARAMBIL VEETTIL, MADATHUMPADY
VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRIT, PINCODE-680 733.
4 DEEPESH,
AGED 34 YEARS
S/O.DIVAKARAN, VETTUVANATHARA VEETTIL, MADATHUMPADY
VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRIT, PINCODE-680 733.
5 RAJESH,
AGED 34 YEARS
S/O.DIVAKARAN, VETTUVANTHARA VEETTIL, MADATHUMPADY
VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRIT, PINCODE-680 733.
BY ADV ASHIK K.MOHAMED ALI
RESPONDENTS/STATE & CHARGE WITNESS NOS 1 & 2:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
PUTHENVELIKKARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM-683 594,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT (THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM), PIN-682031
2 SHAIJU,
CRL.MC NO. 11 OF 2022
2
AGED 38 YEARS
S/O.GEORGE, PULIKKAL VEETTIL, PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM-683 594.
3 JOCKSAN,
AGED 29 YEARS
S/O.GEORGE, PULIKKAL VEETTIL, PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM-683 594.
JOCKSAN, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O GEORGE, PADIYIL VEETTIL,
4 PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM-683594
BY ADV KURIAN JOSEPH (ARAKKUNNAM)
SUDHEER GOPALAKRISHNAN , PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC NO. 11 OF 2022
3
O R D E R
The petitioners are the accused numbers 1 to 5 in Crime No.47/2009
of the Puthenvelikkara police station which is now pending as CC
No.407/2016 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III North
Paravur. The offenses alleged against the petitioners are under section
143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 294(b), 506(i) read with Section 149 of IPC. The
prosecution case is that on 22-01-2009 at 10.45 p.m, due to enmity of the
first petitioner to CW1, petitioners formed into an unlawful assembly,
assaulted and threatened him using filthy languages. When the CWs 2 and
3 tried to intervene, they were also assaulted. Annexure A1 is the final
report submitted by the police. It is reported that, CW3 is no more and
Annexure A4 death certificate has been produced. This Crl.M.C is filed for
quashing all further proceedings pursuant to the above calendar case.
2. Heard Sri.Ashik K.Mohammed Ali, learned Counsel appearing
for the petitioner, Sri.Sudheer Gopalakrishnan, Leaned Public Prosecutor
for the state and Sri.Kurian Josep Arakkunnam, Learned Counsel appearing
for the respondents 2 and 3.
CRL.MC NO. 11 OF 2022
3. Prayer for quashing the proceedings is sought mainly on the
ground that the dispute between the parties has been settled. Annexures-A2
and A3 affidavits sworn by the respondents 2 and 3 are filed along with this
Crl.M.C. to substantiate the settlement. In the said affidavits, the
respondents 2 and 3 had specifically acknowledged the aforesaid settlement
and also conveyed the no-objection to quash the proceedings against the
petitioners herein. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and
3 also confirms the same. The learned Public Prosecutor, upon
instructions, submitted that the Station House Officer concerned has
verified the veracity of the same and found it to be genuine.
4. The allegations would reveal that the dispute is purely private in
nature. In such circumstances, by applying the principles laid down by the
Honorable Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another
[(2012) 10 SCC 303], proceedings can be quashed by invoking the powers
of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This is particularly because, on
account of the settlement, no fruitful purpose would be served by allowing
the prosecution to continue.
5. In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed, and Annexure-A1 final
report submitted in Crime No. 47 of 2009 of Puthenvelikkara Police Station CRL.MC NO. 11 OF 2022
and all further proceedings in C.C. No.407 of 2016 on the file of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, North Paravur against the
petitioners are hereby quashed.
sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE KVT CRL.MC NO. 11 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 11/2022
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CC NO.407 OF 2016 OF THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS III, NORTH PARAVUR.
Annexure A2 THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Annexure A3 THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN THE NAME OF PAVIN, S/O.JOSEPH, PAYYAPPILLY VEETTIL, PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM- 683 594.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!