Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 880 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2022
WP(C) NO. 2121 OF 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 1ST MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 2121 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
M/S. CHALISSEY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.P-579,
CHALISSERY, PALAKKAD-679 536, REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY, SHRI.,PUSHPAKARAN VALIYAVEETUVALAPPIL KANDU.
BY ADVS.
T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)
NISHA JOHN
V.P.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX /INCOME TAX OFFICER,
NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TX DEPARTMENT,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.4501, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP,
JAWAHARLALA STADIUM, DELHI-110 003.
2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI-110 003.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 2121 OF 2022
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
========================
W.P.(C) No.2121 of 2022
------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of January, 2022
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society
registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P1
order of assessment was issued against the petitioner on
28.09.2021. In the assessment order, petitioner's claim for
deduction under Section 80P was rejected on the ground that
there was no evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the
ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society as
contemplated under the Co-operative Societies Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order before the
2nd respondent Appellate Authority, petitioner has sought to
canvass that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi
Service Co-operative Bank and Others v. Commissioner of
Income Tax, Calicut and Others [2021 (1) KLT 485] was not
considered by the assessing officer though the assessment
order was rendered subsequent to the Supreme Court
judgment.
WP(C) NO. 2121 OF 2022
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an
appeal as Ext.P2 and the same is pending consideration before
the 2nd respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be
disposed of directing the Appellate Authority to consider the
appeal in a time bound manner.
4. Accordingly there will a direction to the 2 nd
respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2,
as expeditiously as possible.
5. Till such time, no coercive steps shall be initiated
against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE jm/ WP(C) NO. 2121 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2121/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE ALONG WITH COMPUTATION OF INCOME FOR AY 2015-16 DATED 28.09.2021.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 DATED 25.10.2021 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 DATED 25.10.2021 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!