Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 54 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 13TH POUSHA, 1943
O.P.(RC) NO. 95 OF 2021
AGAINST ORDER DATED 26.08.2021 IN E.P.NO.16 OF 2020 IN
R.C.(OP) NO.2 OF 2019 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL
COURT (MUNSIFF), KARUNAGAPPALLY
PETITIONER:
MANILAL,
AGED 46 YEARS, S/O KARTHIKEYAN,
KURUPPASSERIL PUTHEN VEEDU, PUNNAKULAM SOUTH
MURI, ADINADU VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY,
KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690 544.
BY ADVS.
DEEPA SREENIVASAN
P.H.ABDUL KALAM
M.J.MANOJ
SANUJU R.
RESPONDENTS:
1 DR.AFSAL A. SATHAR
AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL SATHAR,
PANICKA VEEDU, ADINADU, SOUTH MURI,
KARUNAGAPPALLY, PIN - 690518.
2 NAFEESAKUNJU,
AGED 50 YEARS, W/O LATE ABDUL SATHAR,
PANICKA VEEDU, ADINADU SOUTH MURI,
KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN 690 518.
BY ADV A.SHAFEEK (KAYAMKULAM)
THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 03.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2
O.P.(RC) No.95 of 2021
JUDGMENT
Ajithkumar, J.
The tenant-judgment debtor is the petitioner. The
respondent filed R.C.(OP) No.2 of 2019 before the Rent
Control Court (Munsiff), Karunagappally seeking eviction on
the ground of arrears of rent. Parties entered into a
compromise and the R.C.(OP) was disposed of in terms of the
said compromise. The petitioner did not comply with the
terms of the compromise, and therefore, the respondent filed
E.P.No.16 of 2020 seeking delivery of the petition schedule
building in execution of the said compromise, which has
matured into an order of eviction.
2. Ext.P1 order was passed by the executing court
(Munsiff), Karunagappally directing delivery of the petition
schedule building. Challenging the said order the petitioner
preferred this Original Petition invoking Article 227 of the
Constitution of India.
3. On 24.09.2021, when this case came up for
consideration, notice on admission was ordered to the
respondents. Delivery of the petition schedule building was
O.P.(RC) No.95 of 2021
ordered to be deferred for a period of one week on condition
of deposit of Rs.5 lakhs towards arrears of rent. On
11.10.2021, on finding that the petitioner did not make the
deposit as per the aforesaid direction, this Court ordered that
the interim order would not be in force after 25.09.2021.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Ext.P1
order is amenable to revision as per the proviso to Section 14
of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965,
and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the Original
Petition without prejudice to his right to challenge the order
before the appropriate authority.
4. Having heard both sides, permission is granted to
withdraw the Original Petition. Hence, the Original Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the
petitioner to challenge Ext.P1 order in accordance with law.
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE dkr
O.P.(RC) No.95 of 2021
APPENDIX OF O.P.(RC) NO.95 OF 2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2021.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RENT AGREEMENT DATED 01.03.2018.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION DATED 09.01.2020.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 26.07.2019 OF RS.7,00,000/-.
Exhibit P4(A) TRUE COPY OF THE RENT PAID BY THE
PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT ON
09.09.2019.
Exhibit P4(B) TRUE COPY OF THE RENT PAID BY THE
PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT ON
15.12.2019.
Exhibit P4(C) TRUE COPY OF THE RENT PAID BY THE
PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT ON
15.12.2019.
Exhibit P4(D) TRUE COPY OF THE RENT PAID BY THE
PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT ON
15.12.2019.
Exhibit P4(E) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED
25.11.2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!