Saturday, 11, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jayakrishnan vs The State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 213 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 213 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022

Kerala High Court
Jayakrishnan vs The State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2022
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
     TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943
                      BAIL APPL. NO. 9800 OF 2021
             CRIME NO.2121/2021 OF ADOOR POLICE STATION
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

            JAYAKRISHNAN
            AGED 23 YEARS
            S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, CHATHAKULAM, PORUVAZHY VADAKKU,
            KOLLAM.

            BY ADV SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY



RESPONDENT/STATE:

            THE STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
            KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.


OTHER PRESENT:

            SMT. SEETHA .S. (SR.PP)




     THIS   BAIL    APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
11.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO.9800 OF 2021
                                     2

                                 ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.2121/2021 of

Adoor Police Station, alleging commission of offences under Sections

354-D, 506(i) and 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was in a

relationship with the daughter of the de-facto complainant and he had

at some point threatened the daughter of the de-facto complainant that

he would reveal her pictures on social media and further that he would

pour acid on her face if she dares to get out of her house. It is alleged

that owing to the threat as aforesaid by the petitioner, the daughter of

the de-facto complainant consumed sanitizer and attempted to commit

suicide.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

among the offences alleged against the petitioner, only the offence

under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code is a non-bailable offence. It

is submitted that going by the law laid down by the Supreme Court in

Satvir Singh and others vs. State of Panjab and another

(2001 (8) SCC 633), the offence under Section 306 of the Indian BAIL APPL. NO.9800 OF 2021

Penal Code is clearly not attracted as the daughter of the de-facto

complainant only attempted to commit suicide and did not succeed in

her attempt. Specific reference is made to paragraph 7 of the aforesaid

judgment to establish that the law penalises only a person who abetted

a suicide and not a person who abetted the attempt to commit suicide.

He, therefore, submitted that even if the entire allegations are accepted

to be true, the offence under Section 306 IPC is not attracted.

5. I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor has taken me through the

statement given by the daughter of the de-facto complainant to show as

to how the petitioner driven the daughter of the de-facto complainant

to suicide. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are

serious and the grant of bail, at this stage, may affect the progress of

investigation.

7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

and taking into consideration the law laid down by the Supreme Court

in Satvir Singh (supra), I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled

to anticipatory bail as prima facie, the offence under Section 306 of the

IPC is not attracted. This observation is not to be treated as a finding

by this Court on the point.

BAIL APPL. NO.9800 OF 2021

8. In the result, this bail application is allowed and it is

directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of the

arrest in connection with Crime No.2121/2021 of Adoor Police Station,

subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Court;

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.2121/2021 of Adoor Police Station as and when summoned to do so;

(iii) Petitioner shall not attempt to contact the daughter of the de-facto complainant or to interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No.2121/2021 of Adoor Police Station;

(iv) Petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating

officer in Crime No.2121/2021 of Adoor Police Station may file an

application before this Court, for cancellation of bail.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE bng/11.01.22

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter