Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1920 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 5499 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
VELAYUDHAN
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O. KOTHA, ATHANIPPARAMBIL, ANGADI, PATTITHARA
VILLAGE, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679 552
BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
RESPONDENT:
SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR)
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), MINI CIVIL
STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679 104
SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY SR.G.P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 5499 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is stated to be a
senior citizen of over 61 years in age, has
approached this Court alleging that, even
though a suo motu proceedings has been
initiated against her by the respondent
Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and numbered
as S.M.No.222 of 2022, further action thereon
has not been completed until now. The
petitioner, therefore, prays the respondent be
directed to do so and issue appropriate final
orders thereon, within a time frame to be
fixed by this Court.
2. In response, the learned Senior
Government Pleader - Smt.K.Amminikutty,
submitted that, if the suo motu proceedings are
still pending against the petitioner, the same
can be disposed of by the respondent, within a WP(C) NO. 5499 OF 2022
period of eight months, taking note of the fact
that he is a senior citizen. He, therefore,
prayed that this writ petition be ordered only
on such terms.
3. When I consider the afore submissions,
it is ineluctable that if S.M.No.222 of 2022 is
still pending against the petitioner, then it
will require to be disposed of by the
respondent within a period of eight months,
because this is the time frame that has been
constantly followed by this Court in the case
of senior citizens.
Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered,
directing the respondent to complete
proceedings in S.M.No.222 of 2022, after
following due procedure and after affording
necessary opportunity of being heard to the
petitioner - as also to any other
interested/affected persons - thus, culminating
in an apposite order thereon, as expeditiously WP(C) NO. 5499 OF 2022
as is possible, but not later than eight months
from the date of receipt of a certified copy of
this judgment.
Though there is no specific averment
regarding the involvement of any Devaswom
Board in the S.M. Proceedings, it is made
clear that if the competent Authority is to
find so, then the said entity will also be
given an opportunity of being heard while the
afore directed exercise is completed.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE SAS/18/02/2022 WP(C) NO. 5499 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5499/2022
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED IN S.M.NO.222/2022 BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 09.02.2022
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD NO.7102 1759 9816 OF THE PETITIONER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!