Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12521 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 2ND POUSHA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 9682 OF 2022
CRIME NO.693/2022 OF MANNAR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/2ND ACCCUSED:
DEEPU S
AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. SAHADEVAN , CHATHEL, THAYOOR,
BUDHANNOOR P.O., ENNAKADU, CHENGANNUR THALUK,
ALAPUZHA DIST. , PIN - 689510
BY ADVS.
SINU.G.NATH
VARUGHESE OOMMEN
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURTOF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANNAR POLICE STATION
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 689622
BY ADV
SRI.M.C.ASHI - PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
BA No.9682 of 2022
.. 2 ..
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
====================
B.A. No.9682 of 2022
====================
Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2022
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail.
2. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.693/2022
of Mannar Police Station, Alappuzha alleging commission of
offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323, 324, 341, 308
and Section 34 of the IPC.
3. The prosecution allegation is that, on a provocation
that the defacto complainant consumed toddy from the bottle
bought by the petitioner, the petitioner slapped the defacto
complainant on his left cheek and he was attacked by the other
accused also and thus the accused have committed the
aforesaid offences.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
he has been falsely implicated in the above said crime and no
serious overt acts are alleged against him.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions
submitted that it is true that the only allegation against the BA No.9682 of 2022 .. 3 ..
petitioner is that he slapped on the face of the defacto
complainant. It is further submitted that the petitioner is
involved in two other criminal cases.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case and considering the nature of the allegations, I am of the
opinion that the custodial interrogation may not be required for
the purpose of the investigation and only a limited custody be
granted for the same. In the result, this application is allowed.
It is directed that the petitioner shall surrender before the
investigating officer on 29.12.2022, at 11 a.m, and subject
himself for interrogation on that day and on any other day/days
as directed by the investigating officer. The petitioner shall co-
operate with the investigation. In the event of arrest of the
petitioner in Crime No.693/2022 of Mannar Police Station,
Alappuzha, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional Court
on the very same day and shall be released on bail, subject to
the following conditions:-
(i) Petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with
two solvent sureties each for the like-sum to
the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court ;
BA No.9682 of 2022 .. 4 ..
(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer in Crime No.693/2022 of
Mannar Police Station, Alappuzha, on every
Saturday, at 11 am, until the filing of the final
report;
(iii) Petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer in Crime No.693/2022 of
Mannar Police Station, Alappuzha as and when
summoned to do so;
(iv) The petitioner shall not attempt to (contact
the victim or the defacto complainant) or
interfere with the investigation or to influence
or intimidate any witness in Crime
No.693/2022 of Mannar Police Station,
Alappuzha;
(v) The petitioner shall not involve in any
other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the
investigating officer in Crime No.693/2022 of Mannar Police
Station, Alappuzha may file an application before the
jurisdictional Court, for cancellation of bail. BA No.9682 of 2022 .. 5 ..
It is made clear that it is within the power of the police to
investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries on
the information if any given by the petitioner, even when the
petitioner is on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in
Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State(NCT of Delhi) and
another(2020(1)KHC 663).
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE ded/23.12.2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!