Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12499 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 2ND POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 41376 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
GOPIKA JAYAKUMAR
AGED 18 YEARS
PLUS TWO STUDENT,
GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KUNCHITHANNY,
IDUKKI, RESIDING AT PUTHEN PURACKAL HOUSE,
CHITHIRAPURAM P.O, ANACHAL, IDUKKI- PIN- 685565
PIN - 68556
BY ADVS.
T.P.PRADEEP
P.K.SATHEES KUMAR
MINIKUMARY M.V.
R.K.PRASANTH
JIJO JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695014, PIN - 695014
2 THE APPEAL COMMITTEE
IDUKKI REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2022-23
REPRESENTED BY IT'S CHAIRMAN,
OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THODUPUZHA
IDUKKI.- 685584
, PIN - 685584
3 THE CHAIRMAN/DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
THE APPEAL COMMITTEE,
IDUKKI REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2022-23
OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THODUPUZHA
IDUKKI.- 685584
PIN - 685584
AMMINIKUTTY K, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)NO.41376 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2022
Petitioner participated for the items Mohiniyattam
and Folk dance in the Idukki Revenue District
Kalolsavam, 2022-23. The petitioner's grievance is
regarding her 2nd with A grade in Folk dance.
According to the petitioner, she had lost valuable
marks due to the refusal of the stage manager to
permit her to use the pen drive containing the sound
recording of the programme.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted
that the songs for Mohiniyattam and Folk dance was
recorded in one pen drive. The pen drive was used
for Mohiniyattam performance and thereafter
submitted for being used for Folk dance also. But,
stage manager refused permission for using the pen
drive stating that one pen drive containing two songs
cannot be used. Faced with such objection, petitioner W.P.(C)NO.41376 OF 2022
was compelled to transfer the song to another device
at the last moment. The confusion upset her and
effected her performance also. Even though this
aspect was highlighted in the appeal, no mention is
seen made in the impugned order. Learned Counsel
also contended that, going by the wordings in the
appellate order, it appears that the order is passed in
someone else's appeal.
3. Learned Government Pleader submitted that
the appellate order was rendered after considering all
aspects. As directed by this Court, a copy of the
stage manager's report is also made available. A
perusal of the report shows that some portions are
left blank. As contended by learned Counsel for the
petitioner, from the appellate order it is not
discernible as to whether the petitioner's grievance is
addressed or not.
4. In such circumstances, it is only just and
proper for the appeal committee to reconsider the W.P.(C)NO.41376 OF 2022
appeal.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of,
directing the 3rd respondent to reconsider petitioner's
appeal and pass a reasoned order thereon within five
days.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE NB/23-12 W.P.(C)NO.41376 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41376/2022
PETITIONER's EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD FOR KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, IDUKKI REVENUE DISTRICT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07.12.2022
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!