Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11809 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 41759 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
PRIYESH A.,
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAN, AYANATH HOUSE, KOYYAM P.O,
CHENGALAI AMSOM, KANNUR DISTRICT PIN - 670142.
BY ADVS.
V.T.MADHAVANUNNI
V.A.SATHEESH
ANAND V.S
RESPONDENTS:
1 DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,(RR),
TALUK OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION,
TALIPARAMBA P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670141.
2 VILLAGE OFFICER,
CHUZHALI VILLAGE OFFICE, CHUZHALI P.O,
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670142.
3 VILLAGE OFFICER,
CHENGALAI VILLAGE OFFICE,
CHENGALAI P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670142.
4 DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
CIVIL STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670002.
5 GEOLOGIST,
MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT,
DISTRICT OFFICE, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670002.
SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.41759 of 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 21st day of December, 2022
The petitioner, is a resident of Chengalai Amsom in
Kannur District. In the year 2019, the petitioner was issued
with Ext.P1 order dated 30.10.2019 pointing out that the
petitioner is liable to pay an amount of ₹3,49,020/- towards
royalty, penalty and price as regards the alleged illegal lateral
stone mining conducted by the petitioner. The 5th respondent-
Geologist had made a requisition to the 4 th respondent-District
Collector for recovery of the amount and interest at the rate of
12% per annum from the petitioner. Now, the 1 st respondent-
Deputy Tahsildar has issued Exts.P2 and P3 Revenue
Recovery Notices to the petitioner.
2. The petitioner states that at this stage, the
petitioner is not disputing the amount demanded by the WP(C) No.41759 of 2022
Geologist from the petitioner. However, the petitioner is not in
a position to pay the amount of ₹4,52,521/- together. The
petitioner will be able to pay the amount in instalments.
3. Government Pleader entered appearance on behalf
of the respondents and resisted the writ petition. The
Government Pleader denied all the allegations made by the
petitioner in the writ petition. The demand was made as early
on 30.10.2019. The petitioner has resorted to illegal mining of
laterite stone. Therefore, the petitioner is bound to pay the
amount to the Government, failing which, there will be loss to
the public exchequer.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Government Pleader representing the
respondents.
5. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner
is not disputing the amount demanded as per Ext.P1 order WP(C) No.41759 of 2022
and taking into consideration the averments made by the
petitioner in the writ petition, I am of the view that reasonable
time can be granted to the petitioner to pay the amount
demanded as per Exts.P1 to P3.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of
permitting the petitioner to pay the amount demanded as per
Ext.P3 in 12 consecutive Equal Monthly Instalments. The first
of such instalments shall be paid on or before 01.01.2023. It is
made clear that the petitioner will also be liable to pay other
charges, if any, under the Revenue Recovery Act. If the
petitioner makes two consecutive defaults in making payment
as directed above, the respondents will be at liberty to
proceed against the petitioner as per Exts.P2 and P3 notices.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk WP(C) No.41759 of 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41759/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/10/2019 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. 5. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 24/11/2022 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE BEFORE ATTACHMENT DATED 24/11/2022 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!