Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.C.Alias vs The Revenue Divisional Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 11221 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11221 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2022

Kerala High Court
M.C.Alias vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 2 December, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
  FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA,
                            1944
                  WP(C) NO. 26953 OF 2012
PETITIONER/S:

          M.C.ALIAS,
          AGED 50 YEARS
          S/O.CHERIAN, MOOLAMKUZHIYIL HOUSE, MARADY
          VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
          BY ADVS.
          SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY
          SRI.ANIL GEORGE
          SRI.T.ANCY
          SRI.K.S.SUMEESH


RESPONDENT/S:

    1     THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
          MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
          PIN-686661.
    2     THE KERALA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
          REP.BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINNER
          GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN-682020.
    3     THE VILLAGE OFFICE
          MARADY, MUVATTUPUZHA
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN-686661.
    4     SHANS PAUL
          AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O.LATE PAUL
          KOCHUKUDIYIL HOUSE MARADY,
          MUVATTUPUZHA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN-686673.
          BY ADVS.
          SRI.V.G.ARUN
          SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
                                         -2-
W.P.(C). No. 26953 of 2012



OTHER PRESENT:

                SRI.T.R HARIKUMAR FOR R4
                T.NAVEEN,SC


        THIS       WRIT      PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION         ON     02.12.2022,    THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                      -3-
W.P.(C). No. 26953 of 2012



                             P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                             ======================================================

                              W.P.(C) No.26953 of 2013
                         =============================================================

                  Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2022

                                          JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ calling for the entire records relating to Exhibit P3 and quash the same.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 1" respondent to take action on Exhibit P1 and P2 forthwith.

iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to conduct inspection in the matter and to take appropriate action for stopping the illegal dumping of waste materials by the 4th respondent. And

iv) grant full cost to the petitioner for the institution and conduct of this writ petition." (sic)

2. The petitioner is a resident of Marady Grama

Panchayat. It is the case of the petitioner that the 4 th respondent

is running a crusher unit within 76 meters from the residence of

the petitioner. The property of the 4th respondent is lying in

W.P.(C). No. 26953 of 2012

higher level. According to the petitioner, the 4 th respondent

removed rocks from his property of 3 acres which made all the

wells in the locality empty and caused serious drinking water

problem. It is also the case of the petitioner that the large ponds

are formed. It is also stated that the 4 th respondent brought

chemical waste to dump into the large ponds, which also creates

pollution. Hence this writ petition is filed.

3. This writ petition is pending before this Court from

2012 onwards. No interim order is passed in this case.

4. The counsel for the 4th respondent submitted that

Ext.P3 stop memo is already is vacated based on the inspection

conducted by the 1st respondent.

5. Hence if there is any surviving grievance, the

petitioner is free to approach the competent authority among the

respondents with appropriate representation, and if any such

representation is received, the appropriate authority will consider

W.P.(C). No. 26953 of 2012

the same, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner

and the 4th respondent.

With the above observation, this writ petition is closed.

sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter