Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9960 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 9TH BHADRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 23261 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
K M UPENDRAN
AGED 72 YEARS
S/O. MADHAVAN (LATE), KARUTHANATTU HOUSE, PANANGAD P.O.,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 506
BY ADVS.
T.R.HARIKUMAR
ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, DPI JUNCTION, THYCAUD P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 014
2 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL),
5TH FLOOR, NEW BLOCK, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM,PIN-682 030
3 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
(GENERAL), KANAYANNUR, VALANJAMBALAM, KOCHI,PIN-682 016
4 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE PERUMANOOR PEOPLES CO-
OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.679,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, THEVARA P.O., KOCHI,PIN-682
013
5 THE PERUMANOOR PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.679,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THEVARA P.O., KOCHI,PIN-682
013
6 THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES' PENSION BOARD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.B.NO.85, KALA NIVAS,
CHINMAYA LANE, KUNNUMPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695
001
WP(C) NO. 23261 OF 2022
2
BY ADVS.
S.SUJIN
M.SASINDRAN
N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.)
NITA.N.S.
B.BILWIN
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.PARVATHY K-GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 31.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 23261 OF 2022
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner alleges that, even in spite of Ext.P1
judgment having been obtained by him as early as on
04/03/2021, the 5th respondent - Perumanoor Peoples Co-
operative Society has not yet taken any steps to enrol him in
the Employees Pension Scheme, or to remit the necessary
contribution as per the same, to the 6 th respondent - Kerala
State Co-operative Employees' Pension Board (hereinafter
referred to as the "Pension Board" for short).
2. Sri.T.A.Harikumar - learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, submitted that the action of the Society is in blatant
disregard to Ext.P1 judgment and that the "Pension Board" also
cannot shy away from their responsibilities, because they had
also been directed to intervene and ensure that the directions
therein are complied with. He, therefore, prayed that the 6 th
respondent - "Pension Board" be directed to take necessary
action against the Society under Clause 38 of the Pension WP(C) NO. 23261 OF 2022
Scheme, without any further delay.
3. In response, the learned Standing Counsel for the
"Pension Board" - Sri.M.Sasindran, submitted that his client's
jurisdiction will start only once the pension papers are
forwarded to them, along with necessary contribution, by the
Society. He, however, conceded that if the contribution is found
to be deficient or insufficient, then certainly the Pension Board
can take action under the afore Clauses and other applicable
provisions of the Pension Scheme.
4. Sri.S.Sujin - learned Standing Counsel for the 5 th
respondent - Society, submitted that Ext.P1 judgment has been
complied with by his client and that all action pursuant thereto
have been completed. He thus prayed that this Writ Petition be
dismissed.
5. Even when I hear Sri.Sujin on the afore lines, there is
nothing on record to show how the Society had complied with
Ext.P1 judgment. I also find favour with the submissions of WP(C) NO. 23261 OF 2022
Sri.M.Sasindran that it is only if the pension papers are
forwarded to the "Pension Board", can they take any further
action. However, since the petitioner asserts that the Society
has not complied with the directions in Ext.P1 nor have they
forwarded the necessary pension papers, along with the
contribution to the Pension Board, I am certain that this is a
matter which will have to seize the attention of the 2 nd
respondent - Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, without
further delay.
6. In fact, I must record that all the learned counsel for
the parties affirmed this and did not oppose it.
In the afore circumstances, I order this Writ Petition and
direct the 2nd respondent - Joint Registrar to hear the
petitioner, as also the 6th respondent and take a decision as to
the claim of the former for being enrolled in the pension
scheme with the 6th respondent - Pension Board, and also with
respect to the contribution to be made by the Society; thus WP(C) NO. 23261 OF 2022
resulting in an appropriate order and necessary action, as
expeditiously as is possible, but not later than two months from
the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Needless to say, depending upon the decision to be taken
by the 2nd respondent - Joint Registrar, the petitioner will be at
liberty to approach the 6th respondent - "Pension Board", who
shall thereafter take necessary action, including under Clauses
37 and 38 of the Pension Scheme, as may be warranted in
future, so as to ensure that the petitioner obtains his pension,
along with arrears, if eligible, without any delay thereafter.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE ANB WP(C) NO. 23261 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23261/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.03.2021 IN WPC NO.9457 OF 2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 01.04.2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT SOCIETY.
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.09.2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT SOCIETY.
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.M11476/2021 DATED 10.01.2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER ALONG WITH THE CALCULATION STATEMENT DATED 12.04.2022, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT SOCIETY.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!