Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9950 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 9TH BHADRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 14267 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
SANDHYA DEVI AMMA G.
AGED 44 YEARS
W/O.BIJU P.R., MUSIC TEACHER, CHEMPAKASSERY H.S.S.,
BHOOTHAKULAM, KOLLAM, RESIDING AT AMRITHA LEKSHMI,
MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTAH P.O, KOLLAM - 690 521.
BY ADV B.MOHANLAL
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.
2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, JAGATHY P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.
3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
THEVALLY P.O., KOLLAM - 691 009.
4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
COLLECTORATE, CUTCHERRY P.O., KOLLAM- 691 013.
5 THE JOINT MANAGER
CHEMPAKASSERY H.S.S., BHOOTHAKULAM P.O.,
PARAVUR, KOLLAM - 691 302.
6 ENNU DACKLY A.M.
AGED 33 YEARS,
D/O ANANDAN K, TEACHER EDUCATOR (ENGLISH),
CHEMPAKASSERY TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE,
BOOTHAKULAM P.O.,KOLLAM - 691 302,
RESIDING AT ' NIRMALYAM', EDEKKIDAM P.O.,
EZHUKONE, KOLLAM - 691 505.
7 RESMI R.I.
AGED 35 YEARS,
W/O MANOJ R.S., TEACHER EDUCATOR,
CHEMPAKASSERY TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE,
BOOTHAKULAM P.O., KOLLAM 691302,
WP(C) NO. 14267 OF 2021 2
RESDIDING AT PANAYANAKATTU VEEDU,
CHENIKUNNU, KILIMANOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
8 GADHA R. NATH G.
TEACHER EDUCATOR, CHEMBAKASSERY TEACHERS TRAINING
INSTITUTE, BOOTHAKULAM P.O., KOLLAM - 691 302, RESIDING AT
ARUN NIVAS, NETTAYAM P.O., AMBALAMKUNNU, KOLLAM 691537.
BY ADVS.
S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY
K.JAJU BABU (SR.)
K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
ELVIN PETER P.J.
N.SANTHA
V.VARGHESE
PETER JOSE CHRISTO
S.A.ANAND
K.N.REMYA
L.ANNAPOORNA
M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI
BRIJESH MOHAN
K.R.GANESH
P.MOHANDAS
SMT.NISHA BOSE, SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 14267 OF 2021 3
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition was taken up, Sri.B.Mohan Lal, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner be
permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move afresh at a
later stage, if so advised.
Reserving such right, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE sru
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!