Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mallika @Rajasree T.V vs The Revenue Divisional Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 9743 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9743 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2022

Kerala High Court
Mallika @Rajasree T.V vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 26 August, 2022
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
  FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 4TH BHADRA, 1944
                    WP(C) NO. 27734 OF 2022


PETITIONER

         MALLIKA @RAJASREE T.V.
         AGED 56 YEARS
         W/O. P.N. CHANDRAN, KUDIYIRIKKALPADAM,
         THRIKKAKARA NORTH,
         CHANGAMPUZHA NAGAR P.O, ERNAKULAM - 682033.
         BY ADVS.
         P.K.SAJEEVAN
         O.U.ANISH RAJ
         A.H.SINCEY
         BIJU.V.JOHN
         RADHAKRISHNAN B.
         B.SYED MOHAMMED
         RAMLAL V.R.

RESPONDENTS


    1    THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
         REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
         FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM - 682002.

    2    TAHSILDAR (LR),
         KANAYANNOOR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE,
         ERNAKULAM - 682312.
 W.P(C) No. 27734 of 2022         2
]



     3       THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
             OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE OFFICE, EDAPPALLY SOUTH,
             ERNAKULAM - 682025.



             SRI.JIBU T S, GP

      THIS    WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON   26.08.2022,   THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT
ERNAKULAM
 W.P(C) No. 27734 of 2022        3
]

                           JUDGMENT

Dated this the 26th day of August, 2022

The petitioner, who is owner of 4.77 Ares of property in

Edappally South Village of Kanayannur Taluk in Ernakulam

District, has filed this writ petition seeking to direct the 1 st

respondent to consider Ext.P8 application and to pass orders

thereon, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that she is the owner in

possession of 4.77 Ares of land comprised in Survey

No.115/12-17 of Edappally South Village of Kanayannur Taluk

in Ernakulam District. The land is garden land. It is not

cultivated with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation either.

However, the land is described as paddy land in Revenue

records.

3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other

purposes. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P8 application in

Form-6 before the Revenue Divisional Officer, invoking the

provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy

] Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The application was filed on

05.08.2022. The application has not been considered so far.

Unless the application is considered expeditiously, the petitioner

will be put to untold hardship and loss, contends the petitioner.

4. The Government Pleader representing the

respondents resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader

controverted all material allegations made by the petitioner, in

the writ petition. The Government Pleader, however, submitted

that since the petitioner has invoked a statutory remedy under

the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and

Wetland Rules, 2008, the application submitted by the petitioner

can be considered by the competent authority in accordance

with law, provided the application is received, is complete in all

respects and is supported by all necessary documents.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader representing the respondents.

6. The property of the petitioner is said to be a dry land,

but it has been described as paddy land, in Revenue records.

] Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and

Wetland Rules, 2008 provides for making applications for

changing the nature of land in Revenue records. The petitioner

has invoked Rule 12(1) of the Rules, 2008 by filing application

in Form-6. It being a statutory application, the Competent

Authority is bound to consider the application and pass orders

thereon within a reasonable time.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of with a

direction to the 1st respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P8 Form-6 application, if the

same is received supported by all requisite documents and

paying prescribed fee, if any, and to pass orders thereon in

accordance with law, within a period of four months.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE smm/ 30.08.2022

]

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27734/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY WILL NO. 171/2001 DATED 3.12.2001.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE DATED 3.2.2006 OF VASU ISSUED FROM CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.

3020/2019 DATED 18.11.2019.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT OF THE PROPERTY DATED 19.02.2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO. 66765990 DATED 30.07.2022.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK.

Exhibit P7         TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH.
Exhibit P8         TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
                   05.08.2022 IS IN FORM NO. 6 FOR THE

PURPOSE OF COVERED BY EXT.P4 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 05.08.2022 SHOWING THE FEE PAID ALONG WITH EXT.P8.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter