Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9561 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 3RD BHADRA, 1944
OP (FC) NO. 467 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 177/2013 OF FAMILY
COURT, MAVELIKKARA
EP 56/2020 OF FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM
PETITIONER:
VIJAYALEKSHMI, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.JALAJA,
CHITTOOR HOUSE, MUTTOM P.O, CHEPPAD VILLAGE,
KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - , PIN
- 690 511
BY ADVS.
PRATHEESH.P
ANJANA KANNATH
T.S.SREEKUTTY
RESPONDENTS:
1 MANIKUTTAN NAIR @ MANIKANDAN NAIR, AGED 58 YEARS
PATTATHIL HOUSE, ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM - , PIN
- 691 019
2 LAKSHMIKUTTIAMMA, W/O.PADMANABHAN NAIR,
PATTATHIL HOUSE, ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM - , PIN
- 691 019
3 MOHANACHANDRAN, AGED 48 YEARS, PATTATHIL HOUSE,
ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM -, PIN - 691 019
4 USHAKUMARI, AGED 59 YEARS, PATTATHIL HOUSE,
ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM - , PIN - 691 019
5 PRASANNA KUMAR, AGED 54 YEARS, PATTATHIL HOUSE,
ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM - , PIN - 691 019
OP (FC) NO. 467 OF 2022
..2..
6 GIRIJA KUMARI, AGED 56 YEARS, PATTATHIL HOUSE,
ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM - , PIN - 691 019
7 LEKHA P NAIR, AGED 50 YEARS, PATTATHIL HOUSE,
ULIYAKOVIL P.O, KOLLAM- , PIN - 691 019
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
25.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
OP (FC) NO. 467 OF 2022
..3..
J U D G M E N T
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
This original petition is filed at the instance of
the decree holder in O.P No.177 of 2013 on the file of the
Family Court, Mavelikkara. The decree in the above case
is sought to be executed through the Family Court, Kollam.
The execution petition is numbered as E.P No.56 of 2020.
In that, the decree holder filed E.A No.102 of 2022 for
taking action to execute the decree. On account of non
consideration, the petitioner approached this Court.
2. The decree sought to be executed is under
challenge in Mat. Appeal No.567 of 2018. In that, this
Court passed an order staying the execution, on condition
that the appellant therein, who is the judgment debtor,
shall furnish security to the satisfaction of the Family
Court. It is now submitted at the Bar, on behalf of the
respondent in this original petition, that he has
furnished security.
3. If the security has been furnished, the Family
Court will have to wait till the conclusion of the Mat. OP (FC) NO. 467 OF 2022
..4..
Appeal before this Court. However, if the security is not
been furnished, necessary action shall be taken by the
Family Court to execute the decree in accordance with law,
without any delay, at any rate, within a period of three
months.
This original petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
Sd/-
SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE PR OP (FC) NO. 467 OF 2022
..5..
APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 467/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN OP NO.177/2013 DATED 23.2.2018 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA
Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE E.P NO.56/2020 IN OP NO.177/2013 (FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA) ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM
Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.3.2021 IN I.A NO.2/2018 IN MAT APPEAL NO.567/2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
Exhibit P4 THE COPY OF THE E.A NO.102/2022 IN E.P NO.56/2020 IN OP NO.177/2013 DATED 2.8.2022 FILED BEFORE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!