Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4842 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 414 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 921/2015 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS
-II,ATTINGAL
PETITIONER/S:
1 SOURAV
AGED 41 YEARS
S/O. JAGANADHAN, KUNNATHU VEEDU, CHANGAYILKONAM, MADAVOOR VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695602.
2 SREEJESH
AGED 29 YEARS
S/O. THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI, KONATH PUTHEN VEEDU, CHANGAYILKONAM,
MADAVOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695602.
3 JAYACHANDRAN
AGED 33 YEARS
S/O. SADANANDAN, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEETTIL, CHANGAYILKONAM,
MADAVOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695602.
4 RAJESH
AGED 33 YEARS
S/O. SHANMUGHAN, RADHABHAVAN, CHANGAYILKONAM, MADAVOOR VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695602.
5 SURESH,
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O. SHANMUGHAN, RADHABHAVAN, CHANGAYILKONAM, MADAVOOR VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695602.
BY ADVS.
K.SIJU
ANJANA KANNATH
T.S.SREEKUTTY
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM - 682031.
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
PALLICKAL POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 670702.
3 NIJAF
AGED 33 YEARS
S/O. NUJUMUDEEN, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PULIYOORKONAM, MADAVOOR
VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695602.
4 ANWAR
AGED 31 YEARS
KOOVAKUZHI KUNNIL VEEDU, PULIYOORKONAM, MADAVOOR VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695602.
BY ADV A.MUHAMMED RAFFI
OTHER PRESENT:
Crl.M.C No. 414 of 2022
2
SRI. NOUSHAD K.A-SR.PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.04.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C No. 414 of 2022
3
ORDER
The petitioners are accused in Crime No.320/2015 of
Pallickal Police station registered offences punishable under
sections 143, 147, 341, 323, 294(b) r/w 149 of IPC.
2. Heard.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the
parties and the learned Public Prosecutor that the matter has been
settled between the parties. The respondents 3 and 4, who are de-
facto complainants, filed affidavit stating that the matter has been
settled between the parties and hence, they have no further
grievance against the petitioners. Since the matter has been
settled between the parties, quashing the said offence would
secure the ends of justice. For the said reason, I am inclined to
quash FIR and final report in Crime No.320/2015 of Pallickal Police
station and all further proceedings in C.C.No.921/2015 of Judicial
First Class Magistrate Court-II, Attingal, Thiruvananthapuram, in Crl.M.C No. 414 of 2022
exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to meet
the ends of justice and accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.
Sd/-
BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE rps/ Crl.M.C No. 414 of 2022
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 414/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF FIR WITH FIS IN CRIME NO. 320/2015 OF PALLICKAL POLICE STATION DATED 17.04.2015.
Annexure 2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 320/2015 OF PALLICKAL POLICE STATION DATED 21.04.2015.
Annexure 3 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 15.01.2022.
Annexure 4 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 15.01.2022 COMPROMISE DATED 25.09.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!