Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishnu Prasad vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 4780 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4780 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2022

Kerala High Court
Vishnu Prasad vs State Of Kerala on 26 April, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
     TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 6TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                       WP(C) NO. 14685 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:

    1     VISHNU PRASAD,
          AGED 29 YEARS
          S/O. PRASADHKUMAR P.,
          RESIDING AT SIVAPRIYA,
          TRA C-5, THEKKEVILA, KOLLAM.

    2     P.K. RAJAMMA,
          AGED 75 YEARS
          W/O. LATE THAMPIKUTTY, MARUTHUPARAMBIL, PALIYEKKARA
          PALACE ROAD, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA .

          BY ADVS.
          A.L.NAVANEETH KRISHNAN
          V.HARISH
          ASWATHY KRISHNAN
          RAJAN VISHNURAJ



RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
          GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

    2     THE MARRIAGE OFFICER,
          SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE,
          ERAVIPURAM, KOLLAM 691 011.


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)No. 14685 of 2022                  2


                                 JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners praying

for a direction to the 2nd respondent, the Marriage Officer

to solemnize the marriage between the 1st petitioner and

the daughter of the 2nd petitioner pursuant to Exhibit P1

notice under the Special Marriage Act through online

mode/video conferencing.

2. The marriage between the 1st petitioner and the

daughter of the 2nd petitioner has been fixed by their

families. The daughter of the 2nd petitioner is at present

pursuing her Master's decree in Public Health at Anglia

Ruskin University, Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Even

though the parties have decided to solemnize the marriage

under the Special Marriage Act on 29.4.2022 before the 2 nd

respondent-Marriage Officer, the daughter of the 2nd

respondent is not in a position to make herself available

physically before the 2nd respondent for performing the

marriage. The reason highlighted are two fold; due to

travel restriction on account of Covid-19 pandemic and also

due to the fact that her 3rd Trimester classes has

commenced. This Writ Petition is filed in the said

circumstances.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners brought my

attention to Ext.P2 interim order passed by a Division

Bench of this Court wherein detailed guidelines are

prescribed for solemnizing the marriage under the Special

Marriage Act through on-line mode. Since marriage in such

mode is permitted by this Court subject to the guidelines

framed in the said order, I am of the view that, this Writ

Petition can be disposed of in tune with the guidelines

prescribed in Ext.P2.

5. In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of

directing the 2nd respondent to solemnize the marriage

between the 1st petitioner and the daughter of the 2nd

respondent Ms.Parvathy Maruthuparampil Thampykutty, subject

to the following conditions:

i. The witnesses required for solemnization of

marriage shall be present before the Marriage Officer;

ii) The witnesses shall identify the parties

who are online;

iii) The copies of passport or any other

public documents in respect of the parties who

appear online shall be provided to the Marriage

Officer for identification by the Marriage

Officer;

iv. Wherever signature of parties are

required, that shall be affixed by the authorized

Power of Attorney of the parties or any agent who

produce any other official documents recognized

under the Indian law on behalf of the parties who

appear online. Since the 2nd petitioner, who is

the mother of the bride, is acting as the agent

for her daughter, the 2nd petitioner shall be

permitted to represent the said Ms.Parvathy

Maruthuparampil Thampykutty to perform the

marriage, even in the absence of any documents

substantiating the agency.

II. All other necessary formalities as required by law

shall be complied with before solemnization of marriage.

III. The Marriage Officer shall fix the date and time

and convey the same to the parties in advance.

IV. The Marriage Officer is free to fix the mode of

online platform.

V. The Marriage Officer is directed to comply with the

directions as expeditiously as possible on completion of

the statutory formalities.

VI. On solemnization of marriage, the certificate of

marriage shall be issued to the manner as referred to in

Section 13 of the Special Marriage Act.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

JUDGE

pkk

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14685/2022

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE INTENDED FOR MARRIAGE DATED 25.3.2022 ALONG WITH THE RECEIPT.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 09.09.2021 IN WPC NO. 15244/2021 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.04.2022 WITHOUT ITS ENCLOSURE ISSUED BY THE GROOM.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION DATED 18.04.2022 ISSUED BY THE BRIDE ALONG WITH A COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE 2ND PETITIONER.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SCREENSHOT OF THE EMAIL COMMUNICATION SENT BY MS. PARVATHY MARUTHUPARAMBIL THAMPIKUTTY DATED 24.04.2022.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/- P.S. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter