Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aji vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 4312 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4312 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2022

Kerala High Court
Aji vs State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2022
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
    THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1944
                        CRL.MC NO. 1993 OF 2022
         CRIME NO.873/2007 OF Nedumangad Police Station,
    SC 2007/2008 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT
                   (POCSO), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED 2:

          AJI, AGED 43 YEARS,S.V. BHAVAN, VETTUGOD RAIL WAY GATE,
          WARD NO. XI, ANDOORKONAM, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 695584

          BY ADV MITHUN P.


RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & DEFACTO COMPLAINANTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          ERNAKULUM, PIN - 682031

    2     VIJI VIJAYAN, AGED 30 YEARS, W/O RAJEEV S.
          1/32 (A) ATHAM NIVAS, KANYIL, PADIKKAVILAKOM,
          KAZHAKUTTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695022

    3     AJITHA, AGED 47 YEARS
          VIJI BHAVAN, CHATHANPAD, KONCHIRA P.O, NEDUMANGAD,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695615

          BY ADV JAEONA JAMES
          SMT. T.V. NEEMA, SR. PP


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.1993/2022

                                  -:2:-



                                ORDER

Dated this the 7th day of April, 2022

This Crl.M.C. has been preferred to quash further

proceedings pursuant to Annexure A1 Final Report in Crime No.

873/2007 of Nedumangad Police Station on the ground of

settlement between the parties.

2. The petitioner is the 2nd accused. It is submitted that

the 1st accused was acquitted. The 3rd respondent is the defacto

complainant.

3. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 363, 366, 366 A read with 34 of IPC.

4. The respondent No.3 entered appearance through

counsel. An affidavit sworn in by her is also produced.

5. I have heard Sri. Mithun P., the learned counsel for

the petitioner, Adv. Jaeona James, the learned counsel for the

respondent No.3 and Smt. T.V. Neema, the learned Public

Prosecutor.

6. The averments in the petition as well as the affidavit Crl.M.C.No.1993/2022

sworn in by the respondent No.3 would show that the entire

dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and the

de facto complainant has decided not to proceed with the crime

further. The learned Prosecutor, on instruction, submits that the

matter was enquired into through the investigating officer and a

statement of the de facto complainant was also recorded wherein

she reported that the matter was amicably settled.

7. The Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab

[2012 (4) KLT 108 (SC)], Narinder Singh and Others v. State

of Punjab and Others [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and in State of

Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019) 5

SCC 688] has held that the High Court invoking S.482 of Cr.P.C

can quash criminal proceedings in relation to non compoundable

offence where the parties have settled the matter between

themselves notwithstanding the bar under S.320 of Cr.P.C. if it is

warranted in the given facts and circumstances of the case or to

ensure ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process of any

Court.

8. The dispute in the above case is purely personal in Crl.M.C.No.1993/2022

nature. No public interest or harmony will be adversely affected

by quashing the proceedings pursuant to Annexure A1. The

offences in question do not fall within the category of offences

prohibited for compounding in terms of the pronouncement of the

Apex Court in Gian Singh (supra), Narinder Singh (supra) and

Laxmi Narayan (supra).

For the reasons stated above, I am of the view that no

purpose will be served in proceeding with the matter further.

Accordingly, the Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceedings

pursuant to Annexure A1 Final Report in Crime No. 873/2007 of

Nedumangad Police Station stands hereby quashed.

Sd/-

                                          DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
                                                    JUDGE
kp                        True copy
                             P.A. To Judge
 Crl.M.C.No.1993/2022



                  APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 1993/2022

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1            THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT
                       FILED IN IN CRIME NO: 873 / 2007 OF
                       NEDUMANGAD POLICE STATION,
                       THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT

Annexure A2            THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF

THE HON'BLE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE FOR THE TRIAL OF CASES RELATING TO ATROCITIES AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 24.11.2016

Annexure A3 THE AFFIDAVIT, SOLEMNLY AFFIRMED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/INJURED

Annexure A4 THE AFFIDAVIT, SOLEMNLY AFFIRMED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter