Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jose.T.Simon vs Dr.K.Neelakanda Pillai
2021 Latest Caselaw 20304 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20304 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
Jose.T.Simon vs Dr.K.Neelakanda Pillai on 30 September, 2021
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
 THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 8TH ASWINA,
                            1943
                     RSA NO. 898 OF 2010
  AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 30/2008 OF SUB
  COURT, PALA ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN
   O.S.NO.169/2006 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, KANJIRAPPALLY
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2/DEFENDANTS 1 & 2 :

   1     JOSE.T.SIMON, S/O SIMON, THACHARA HOUSE,
         VADAKKUMBHAGOM KARA, CHIRACKADAVU VILLAGE,,
         KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK.

   2     JAIMOL JOSE W/O. JOSE.T.SIMON
         DO-DO-

         BY ADV SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)



RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & REPSONDENTS 3 TO 5/PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANTS 3 TO 5:

   1     DR.K.NEELAKANDA PILLAI [DIED]
         PILLAI, LAKSHMI NILAYAM HOUSE, ZILLA BUNGALOW
         ROAD, KOZHIKODE VILLAGE & DISTRICT-673001.

   2     BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
         A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE INDIAN
         COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT
         BHARATH BHAVAN 476, CURRIMBHOY ROAD, BELLARD
         ESTATE ROAD,, BOMBAY (MUMBAI] REPRESENTED BY
         ITS SECRETARY
 RSA NO. 898 OF 2010

                                    ..2..



    3          THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER BHARAT
               PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, IRRIMPANAM,
               INSTALLATION, IRRIMPANAM.P.O., COCHIN-682309.

    4          LEELA KURIAKOSE W/O. KURIAKOSE
               PULIYIL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM.P.O, CHIRACHADAVU
               VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK-686507.

    *5         DR.GEETHA,W/O LATE DR.K.NEELAKANDA PILLAI,
               RESIDING AT LAKSHMI NILAYAM ROAD, ZILLA BUNGLOW
               ROAD, KOZHIKODE VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT


    *6         DR.MURALI KRISHNA, S/O LATE DR.K. NEELAKANDA
               PILLAI, RESIDING AT LAKSHMI NILAYAM ROAD, ZILLA
               BUNGALOW ROAD, KOZHIKODE VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE
               DISTRICT
               ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 5 AND 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS
               PER ORDER IN I.A.NOS.1 AND 2/2020 AND CM
               APPLN.3/2020 DATED 30.09.2021

           BY    ADVS.
           R1    BY SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR SR.
           R1    BY SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI
           R1    BY PREM NAVAZ
           R2    AND R3 BY N.N. SUGUNAPALAN SR.
           R5    AND R6 BY SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN
           R5    AND R6 BY SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN




        THIS     REGULAR   SECOND    APPEAL    HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION       ON   30.09.2021,    THE     COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 RSA NO. 898 OF 2010

                               ..3..



                           JUDGMENT

This appeal is directed against the judgment and

decree dated 24.06.2010 in A.S.No.30/2008 on the file of

the Sub Court, Pala arising out of the judgment and

decree dated 15.10.2007 in O.S.No.169/2006 on the file

of the Munsiff Court, Kanjirappally.

2. Defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.169/2006 of the

Munsiff Court, Kanjirappally who are in turn respondents

1 and 2 before Sub Court, Pala are the appellants herein.

The suit was instituted by the first respondent for

declaration and injunction for both prohibitory and

mandatory. Respondents 2 to 4 herein are respectively

defendants 3 to 5 before the Munsiff Court and

respondents 3 to 5 before the Sub Court, Pala. On

identical matter, RSA No.1171/2010 was filed by

defendants 3 and 4 before this Court. RSA NO. 898 OF 2010

..4..

3. During the pendency of the proceedings, the

parties settled the matter by way of separate compromise

in RSA.No.1171/2010 wherein the appellants in AS

No.30/2008 are also parties. Since the compromise has

been recorded in RSA No.1171/2010 and the suit was

disposed of in terms of the compromise in RSA

No.1171/2010, the learned counsel for the appellants and

respondents submit that no further relief is warranted in

RSA No.898/2010 and it can be closed.

Recording the submission, RSA No.898/2010 stands

closed, in the light of the compromise in RSA

No.1171/2010.

Pending applications, if any, stand closed.

Sd/-

N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE kkj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter