Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bindu J vs The Authorised Officer/ General ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 19463 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19463 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
Bindu J vs The Authorised Officer/ General ... on 16 September, 2021
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

         THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 25TH BHADRA, 1943

                            WP(C) NO. 19224 OF 2021



PETITIONER



               BINDU J.,
               AGED 50 YEARS
               W/O. RAJAN, TC 16/1006,
               JAGATHY, THYCADU,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

               BY ADV LIJU. M.P



RESPONDENTS:



     1         THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/ GENERAL MANAGER IN CHARGE,
               THE TRIVANDRUM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. NO. 1959,
               HEAD OFFICE, M.G. ROAD,
               THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

     2         THE TRIVANDRUM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. NO. 1959,
               HEAD OFFICE, M.G. ROAD,
               THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014,
               REP. BY GENERAL MANAGER.



               SC SRI.NISHA GEORGE



THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.09.2021,

THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 19224 OF 2021
                                        2




                          BECHU KURIAN THOMAS,     J

                 ===========================
                     W.P.(C) Nos.19224 of 2021
                     ---------------------------------
            Dated this the 16 th day of September, 2021


                                 JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a borrower from the 2 nd respondent

bank. She has committed default in repayment of

the loan amount. Consequently, proceedings have

been initiated by the bank for recovery of the

amounts due from the petitioner after recalling the

loan.

2. Though petitioner has raised various

challenges in the writ petition, during the course

of the hearing, petitioner has confined the relief

to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount

in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the

loan account.

WP(C) NO. 19224 OF 2021

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent

bank that petitioner had committed default in

repayment of the loan amount and hence

petitioner's account was classified as non-

performing. It was further submitted that even

though proceedings for recovery have been

initiated, as a matter of indulgence, respondent

bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue

amount of Rs.1,25,439/- in limited instalments.

Apart from the above, it was also submitted that

if the petitioner is willing to repay the overdue

amount as directed by this Court, the respondent

bank is willing to regularise the loan account.

4. I have heard Adv.Liju M.P., learned counsel

for the petitioner as well as Adv.Nisha George,

the learned counsel for the respondents.

5. Having regard to the circumstances of the

case and the situation now prevailing, apart from WP(C) NO. 19224 OF 2021

the submissions made as recorded above, I am of

the view that the petitioner can be granted an

opportunity to repay the overdue amount in

instalments and, thereafter, if the amount so

directed is repaid within the time as directed

above, to have the loan account regularised.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire

overdue amount of Rs.1,25,439/- from the

petitioner and regularise the loan account of the

petitioner on the following conditions:

(i). The overdue amount shall be repaid in 'eight'

equated monthly instalments.

(ii). The first instalment shall be made on or

before 18.10.2021.

(iii). Petitioners shall continue to pay the regular

EMI's along with the instalments directed above.

(iv). In the event of default of any one

instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled WP(C) NO. 19224 OF 2021

to proceed in accordance with law.

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the

entire amounts, all coercive steps shall be kept in

abeyance.

The above writ petition is disposed of as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE AMV/16/09//2021 WP(C) NO. 19224 OF 2021

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19224/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.12.2020 PASSED BY CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN MC NO. 715/2020. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 01.03.2021 FOR RS. 1,00,000/- ISSUED FROM 2ND RESPONDENT BANK. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL REPORT DATED 17.06.2021 ISSUED BY MEDICAL OFFICER, URBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CENTER, RAJAJI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

  RESPONDENTS EXHIBTS      NIL




                                                TRUE     COPY   P.A.TO JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter