Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nissam C.K vs The Sub Inspector Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 19320 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19320 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
Nissam C.K vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 14 September, 2021
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
                                     &
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
     TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 23RD BHADRA, 1943
                         WP(CRL.) NO. 208 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:

           NISSAM C.K.,
           AGED 24 YEARS
           S/O. ABDUL KARIM, RESIDING AT CHENAKKARAKUNNEL HOUSE
           VAENGALLOOR P.O. THODUPUZHA, TALUK IDUKKI DISTRICT
           685 608.

           BY ADVS.
           L.RAM MOHAN
           M.AUBRY ABRAHAM ISSAC



RESPONDENT/S:

     1     THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE.
           SULTHANBATHERY 675 392.

     2     ABDU, VAZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, NAIKKETTY P.O. SULTHANBATHERY,
           WAYANADU DISTRICT 673 592.




OTHER PRESENT:

           R1 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(Crl)No.208 of 2021                      2

                                   JUDGMENT

Ziyad Rahman A.A. J.

The petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for

issuance of a writ of habeas corpus seeking the

production of Ms.Nourin, daughter of the 2 nd respondent,

before this Court and to set her at liberty. According

to the petitioner, she is under illegal detention of the

2nd respondent.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he is

employed in a private concern at Thodupuzha and he is in

love with the alleged detenue who is studying in

Al Ahzhar college at Thodupuzha for D Pharm course. The

alleged detenue is aged 20 years and both of them have

decided to perform their marriage and to live together.

However, in order to prevent the alleged detenue from

continuing the relationship with the petitioner, the 2 nd

respondent has detained her in his house against the

wish and will of the alleged detenue. This Writ Petition

is filed in the above circumstances.

3. When this Writ Petition came up for admission on

26.8.2021, we passed an order directing the 1 st

respondent to get a statement of the alleged detenue

through a woman police officer without the presence of

her parents or any other family members and to produce

the said statement before this Court. Consequent to the

said direction, the 1st respondent obtained a statement

and the same was produced along with a memo dated

8.9.2021. In the said statement, the alleged detenue

clearly expressed her desire to go along with the

petitioner to perform the marriage between them. It also

reveals that the 2nd respondent is compelling the alleged

detenue to marry another person. However, she stated

that she is not under any illegal detention.

4. In such circumstances, in order to ascertain the

decision of the alleged detenue, we directed the 2 nd

respondent to produce the alleged detenue before the

Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Kalpetta

on 14.9.2021. Accordingly, the alleged detenue was

produced before the DLSA,Kalpetta today and we had an

interaction with her through video conferencing. She

clearly asserted that she wants to go along with the

petitioner herein. We also interacted with the

petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent. We notice that

the alleged detenue is a major and is capable of taking

a decision on her own. She had opted to live with the

petitioner herein and we could not find any extraneous

influence behind such a decision. As we are convinced

that the alleged detenue has voluntarily and consciously

taken a decision to go along with the petitioner, we

permit her to do so. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is

allowed permitting Ms. Nourin, daughter of the 2 nd

respondent herein, to go along with the petitioner.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above

directions.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN,JUDGE

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.,JUDGE

pkk

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 208/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 6/8/21.

Exhibit P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE AD CARD.

//True copy//

Sd/-

P.S. to Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter