Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18972 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 19TH BHADRA, 1943
RP NO. 240 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22984/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD PARTY:
MANIYAPPAN.T.V.
AGED 63 YEARS
S/O.VASUDEVAN, THAIKOOTTATHIL, PATTANAKKAD P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA - 688 531.
BY ADVS.
B.PRAMOD
SMT.NAMITHA JYOTHISH
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:
1 T.G.PADMANABHAN NAIR
AGED 74 YEARS
ALUNKAL PARAMB BHAVANAM, KUTHIYATHODU, WARD NO.19,
THURAVOOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 532.
2 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS/MANAGING COMMITTEE
PATTANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1144,
PATTANAKKAD P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 531, REP.
BY ITS PRESIDENT.
3 PATTANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1144
PATTANAKKAD P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688 531, REP.
BY ITS SECRETARY.
4 JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL)
OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR GENERAL, ALAPPUZHA - 688
001.
R.P. NO. 240 OF 2021
2
SRI.ASWIN SETHUMADHAVAN (SR.GP)
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.09.2021,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.P. NO. 240 OF 2021
3
O R D E R
This review petition has been filed by Sri.Maniyappan.T.V,
who is stated to be the former Secretary of Pattanakkad Service
Co-operative Bank Ltd.
2. According to the review petitioner, the judgment
sought to be reviewed virtually finds him guilty of the allegations
recorded therein; and consequently that he is unable to now pursue
the remedies before the competent Authorities effectively.
3. The petitioner also has a case that the writ petitioner is
not as innocent as he has made himself out to be and that there
are amounts still due from him, though the Bank now takes the
stand that he is free of such debt; and consequently that said
liability is also sought to be cast upon him. The petitioner,
therefore, prays that the judgment sought to be reviewed be
recalled and the writ petitioner be heard again.
4. I have heard Sri.B.Pramod - learned counsel for the
review petitioner; Sri.Somasundaram - learned counsel appearing R.P. NO. 240 OF 2021
for the writ petitioner; Sri.T.R.Harikumar - learned counsel
appearing for the Service Co-operative Bank and the learned
Senior Government Pleader - Sri.Ashwin Sethumadhavan
appearing for the official respondents.
5. I must record upfront that the submissions made on
behalf of the review petitioner by Sri.B.Pramod are not accurate
because, nowhere in the judgment sought to be reviewed, have I
found conclusively that the review petitioner is guilty of any of the
allegations made against him. I have only recorded the
submissions of the learned Senior Government Pleader with
respect to an enquiry stated to have been conducted against the
Bank as also the review petitioner; but I did not find, in any
manner whatsoever, that he was either guilty or innocent.
6. Obviously, therefore, it is for the petitioner to prove his
innocence, untrammeled by any of my observations in the
judgment; and it is apodictic that, if he is able to prove his
innocence and to show that amounts are still due from the writ
petitioner, then necessary action for its recovery will need to be R.P. NO. 240 OF 2021
taken forward by the competent Authorities. I have not impeded
such course, in any manner, in my judgment; and am, therefore, of
the view that this Review Petition is not necessary to be
entertained by this Court.
Resultantly, this Petition is closed, with the afore
clarifications.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE SAS/10/09/2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!