Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammad Salahuddin vs Special Deputy Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 23605 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23605 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Mohammad Salahuddin vs Special Deputy Collector on 30 November, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
   TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
                       WP(C) NO. 23142 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:

    1     MOHAMMAD SALAHUDDIN, AGED 70 YEARS,
          S/O. MOHAMMED KUTTY, SHIRAZ, KAYAMKULAM P. O.,
          KEERIKKAD PART, ALLEPPEY - 690502.

    2     LAZARUS ALOYSIUS, AGED 78 YEARS,
          S/O. SEBASTIAN LAZARUS, MARIYALAYAM,
          SAKTHIKULANGARA P.O., KOLLAM - 691 581.

          BY ADVS.P.SATHISAN
          DONA AUGUSTINE
          RAJITHA K.R


RESPONDENTS:

    1     SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR,
          LAND ACQUISITION (NH), COLLECTORATE,
          CIVIL STATION WARD, ALLEPPEY P.O., PIN - 688 001.

    2     SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR,
          LAND ACQUISITION (NH), COLLECTORATE,
          CIVIL STATION ROAD, CIVIL STATION P.O.,
          KOLLAM - 691013.

    3     STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
          PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM P. O., PIN - 695 001.

    4     PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
          PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, TC 36/414(5),
          KOYIKKAL VEEDU, KAVU LANE, PALKULANGARA P.O.,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 024.

    5     UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY SECRETARY,
          MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS,
          GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CENTRAL DELHI P.O.,
          NEW DELHI - 110 001.
 WP(C) NO. 23142 OF 2021
                                   -2-



    6          DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) & SPECIAL
               SECRETARY, ROOM NO.213, MINISTRY OF ROAD
               TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, 1,
               PARLIAMENT STREET, CENTRAL DELHI P. O.,
               NEW DELHI - 110 001.

    7          PROJECT DIRECTOR,
               NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (HEAD
               OFFICE), DWARAKA SECTOR 10, SOUTH WEST DELHI
               P.O., NEW DELHI - 110 075.

    8          CHAIRMAN, NHAI, G-5 & 6, SECTOR - 10, DWARAKA,
               SOUTH WEST DELHI P.O., NEW DELHI - 110 075.

               BY ADVS.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN
               SMT.MINI GOPINATH, CGC
               SMT.SURYA BINOY.SR.G.P.
               SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI


        THIS    WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION       ON   30.11.2021,   THE   COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 23142 OF 2021
                               -3-

                           JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court

seeking a direction to the competent respondent not to

deduct 6% of the compensation determined with respect

to the building, earlier standing on the property now

acquired by the National Highways Authority of India

(NHAI), saying that they do not propose to take away

the salvage from the said land.

2. Sri.P.Sathisan - learned counsel appearing

for the petitioners, submitted that deduction of 6%

salvage would apply only if his clients remove the

same from the property; but that if they do not do so,

the Competent Authority of the Land Acquisition (CALA)

- appointed under the provisions of the National

Highways Act (NH Act) - is obligated to grant them the

entire compensation determined, without deduction of

any percentage towards "salvage".

3. Sri.K.A.Salil Narayanan - learned Standing

Counsel for the NHAI, submitted that the provision for WP(C) NO. 23142 OF 2021

deduction of salvage has been adopted as per the

directions and instructions of the Ministry of Road

Transport and Highways (MoRTH); and, therefore, that

CALA is obligated to abide by the same.

4. However, to a pointed question from this

Court, Sri.Salil Narayanan submitted that if the

petitioners do not take away the salvage, then

certainly, said instructions do not mention about

deduction of any percentage from the determined Award.

He added that this is a matter to be considered by the

CALA appropriately.

5. In response, Smt.Surya Binoy - learned Senior

Government Pleader, submitted that if the Awards have

not been passed with respect to the property acquired

from the petitioners, then they can be heard with

respect to deduction of salvage percentage by the

CALA. She, however, prayed that this Court may not

make any affirmative declarations in their favour and

leave it to the said Authority to take an apposite

decision thereon as per law.

WP(C) NO. 23142 OF 2021

6. When I consider the afore submissions, prima

facie it appears that the instructions of the MoRTH,

with respect to the salvage, is only in the case where

the owner of the property and the building takes away

the remnants of the demolished structure; however, in

case where an owner decides not to do so, the entire

compensation may have to be determined and paid to

him.

7. In the afore circumstances, I direct the CALA

to consider the case of the petitioners - that they do

not intend to take away the salvage from the acquired

property and, therefore, that they are entitled to

full compensation determined under the provisions of

the NH Act. This direction, of course, will apply only

in the event the Awards in favour of the petitioners

have not been issued until today and not otherwise;

and if, on the contrary, such Awards have already been

issued, then petitioners will certainly have to

challenge the same in terms of Section 3G(5) of the NH

Act, with the afore directions ceasing to have any WP(C) NO. 23142 OF 2021

effect thereupon.

8. To enable an expeditious compliance of the

afore directions, I direct the petitioners to mark

appearance before the CALA at 11 A.M. on 06.12.2021;

and if the Awards have not yet been issued, then their

contentions shall be taken into account, while

settling it in terms of the "NH Act".

This writ petition is thus ordered.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv WP(C) NO. 23142 OF 2021

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23142/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE 3A NOTIFICATION DATED 15.02.2018.

EXHIBIT P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE 3A NOTIFICATION DATED 25.06.2019 BEARING NO.SO 2113(E).

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE 3D NOTIFICATION DATED 12.02.2019 BEARING NO.SO 817(E).

EXHIBIT P2(A) TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE 3D NOTIFICATION DATED 09.06.2020.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 11.10.2021.

EXHIBIT P3(A) TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 11.10.2021.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF NOTIFICATION DATED 28.08.2015 IN S.O.NO.2368(E).

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA DATED 04.10.2019.

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS : NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter