Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23444 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021/4TH AGRAHAYANA,1943
WP(C) NO. 26481 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
THE VATTANATHRA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LIMITED
NO.499, P.O.VATTANATHRA,
ALAGAPPANAGAR, THRISSUR-680302,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
MINI K.R.
BY ADVS.
SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
SMT.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/
ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
NATIONAL e-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
DELHI-110001.
2 NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE
DELHI-110001,
REPRESENTED BY THE
PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER.
3 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)
AYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR,
THRISSUR-680001.
4 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD 2(5), INCOME TAX OFFICE,
AYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAM NAGAR,
THRISSUR-680001.
5 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
INCOME TAX OFFICE, AYAKAR BHAVAN,
MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673001.
W.P.(C) No.26481/21 -:2:-
ADV.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 25.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.26481/21 -:3:-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.26481 of 2021
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered
under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P1 order of
assessment was issued against the petitioner on 16.09.2021. In the
assessment order, petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P
was rejected on the ground that there was no evidence to show that
petitioner satisfied the ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit
Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies
Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order before the 3 rd
respondent, petitioner has sought to canvass that the
judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-
operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax [2021 (1)
KLT 485] was not considered by the assessing officer though the
assessment order was rendered subsequent to the Supreme Court
Judgment.
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as
Ext.P2 and the same is pending consideration before the 3 rd
respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of directing
the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal in a time bound
manner.
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 3 rd respondent to
consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as
possible.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be
initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26481/2021
PETITIONER'S/S' EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19. Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P5 COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), THRISSUR.
Exhibit P6 COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.21200/2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!