Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Secretary To Government vs Muraleedharan.P
2021 Latest Caselaw 23102 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23102 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
The Secretary To Government vs Muraleedharan.P on 24 November, 2021
OP(KAT) No.320/2021                       1/4

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                        PRESENT
                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                           &
                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
         Wednesday, the 24th day of November 2021 / 3rd Agrahayana, 1943
                             OP(KAT) NO. 320 OF 2021
 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23/07/2019 IN OA NO 1717/2017 OF KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE
                          TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
  PETITIONERS/RESPONDDENTS IN OA:

      1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
         PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
         PIN-695001.
      2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, DESIGN AND
         ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
         PIN-695033.
      3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL(A&E)KERALA, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
         PIN-695039.

   RESPONDENT/APPLICANT IN OA:

    MURALEEDHARAN.P, S/O.PADMANABHAN NAIR, AGED 61 YEARS, RETIRED SECOND
    GRADE DRAFTSMAN, PWD ROADS SUB DIVISION, KADUTHURUTHY, KOTTAYAM,
    PIN-686604. RESIDING AT PUTHIYEDATH PAVITHRAM HOUSE, THYKKATTUSSERY,
    CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688528.


         Op Kerala Administrative Tribunal praying inter alia that in the
   circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the OP(KAT) the
   High Court be pleased to stay all the further proceedings in pursuance to
   Exhibit P3 common order dated 23.07.2019 of the Kerala Administrative
   Tribunal in OA No. 1717/2017,pending disposal of the Original Petition
   (KAT)
         This petition coming on for orders on 24/11/2021, upon perusing the
   petition and the affidavit filed in support of OP(KAT) and upon hearing
   the arguments of SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the petitioners, the court
   passed the following:
 OP(KAT) No.320/2021                                  2/4




                      ALEXANDER THOMAS & VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ.
                        .................................................................
                                    O.P.(KAT) No.320 of 2021
                              [Arising out of the impugned order dated 23.07.2019 in
                              O.A. No.1717 of 2017 on the file of the KAT, TVM Bench]
                         .................................................................
                         Dated this the 24th day of November, 2021

                                                   ORDER

We are told that this Court has already issued notice on

admission in a connected matter in O.P.(KAT) No.306 of 2021 filed by

the State which arises out of the very same impugned final order of the

Tribunal, but in relation to another Original Application, viz.,

O.A.No.2055 of 2017. Hence issue notice before admission to the sole

respondent in the O.P by special messenger, returnable within three days.

This Court has already passed an order in O.P.(KAT) No.306 of 2021,

requiring both sides to give certain clarifications and para No.2 of the

abovesaid order dated 10.11.2021 passed by this Court in O.P.(KAT)

No.306 of 2021 at the admission stage, reads as follows:

"2. Sri.Antony Mukkath, the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners in the O.P./respondents in the O.A would submit that it appears that the claim of the applicant is that earlier he had broken/interrupted temporary/provisional service for a total period of 2 years 7 months and 17 days, during the period from 31.12.1980 as Works Superintendent in the Municipal Common Service prior to the day he had secured regular appointment on 08.09.1983 as Overseer Gr.II in the Public Works Department, etc. Further that, the said broken provisional periods of service of the applicant could have been counted for increments, only if it had satisfied the then prescribed conditions in Government Decision No.2 appended under Rule 33 of Part I, KSR and that one of the conditions thereunder is that the two posts in question, that is the one, in relation to the temporary/provisional appointment and the other, in relation to the regular appointment, should carry the same or identical scale of pay and further that, the qualification and method of appointment should be the same and that the posts should fall in the same service. That, condition No.(iii) that the posts should OP(KAT) No.320/2021 3/4

fall in the same service was deleted from Government Decision No.2 only as per notification dated 01.07.1986 and further that, the Government Decision No.2, in its entirety, was later deleted from the statute book with effect from 01.10.1994. If that be so, the abovesaid three conditions could be applicable at the time of the provisional/temporary service claimed by the petitioner which is for the period from 1980 upto 1983. Hence that some time is required to ascertain as to whether the post of Works Superintendent in the Municipal Common Service and the post of Overseer Gr.II in the Public Works Department were having the same scale of pay during the above said period from December 1980 upto September 1983 and also as to whether the qualification and method of appointment were the same for those posts, etc. Further that, the decision rendered by the Division Bench in Dasan K.N. v. State of Kerala (2014 (4) KHC 747) was in relation to a case wherein the prior service of the applicant therein in the local self body was also a regular appointment as can be seen from para No.4 of that judgment. Further that, the learned Senior Government Pleader wants some time to ascertain as to whether the matter which had been decided by the Division Bench in the case in State of Kerala and others v. V.M.Vijayanandan (2014(4) KHC 80) is pending consideration before the Apex Court in SLPs(Civil)/Civil Appeals arising out of other similar cases and if so, as to whether any interim orders have been passed by the Apex Court in those SLPs(Civil)/Civil Appeals."

The abovesaid requisite details covered in the order dated 10.11.2021

passed by this Court in O.P.(KAT) No.306 of 2021 are also applicable in

this case and the learned Senior Government Pleader will ensure that the

requisite details on those points are furnished in this case also well before

the next posting date.

List this case along with O.P.(KAT) No.306 of 2021 on

30.11.2021.

             Handover                                                 Sd/-

                                                ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE


                                                                      Sd/-

                                                        VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE

             cks


24-11-2021                          /True Copy/                                    Assistant Registrar
 OP(KAT) No.320/2021                 4/4

                       APPENDIX OF OP(KAT) 320/2021
Exhibit P3            TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED

23.07.2019 IN THE AFORESAID ORIGINAL APPLICATION

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter