Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sandeep G. Nath vs The Managing Director
2021 Latest Caselaw 9418 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9418 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2021

Kerala High Court
Sandeep G. Nath vs The Managing Director on 22 March, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

     MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1943

                      WP(C).No.13881 OF 2012(I)


PETITIONER:

               SANDEEP G. NATH, "SARAS", MAMATHA NAGAR-53,
               KAZHAKKUTTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 582.

               SRI.POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
               SRI.R.V.ABHISHEK
               SRI.JIBU P THOMAS
               SRI.P.S.SURESH KUMAR

RESPONDENTS:

      1        THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
               KERALA STATE AUDIO-VISUAL AND REPROGRAPHICAL CENTRE,
               (C-APT-CENTRE FOR ADVANCE PRINTING TECHNOLOGY),
               VATTIYOORKKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 013, RETITLED
               AS KERALA STATE CENTRE FOR ADVANCE PRINTING AND
               TRAINING-C-APT.

      2        STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
               DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

               SMT.K.K.RAZIYA , SC.
               SRI.K.ANAND
               SRI.B.S.KRISHNAN SR.
               SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
22.03.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).15224/2012(C), THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.13881 OF 2012(I) & CON.CASE

                                          2

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                       PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

      MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1943

                            WP(C).No.15224 OF 2012


PETITIONER:

                 VINOD V.J., "PRANAVAM", ARIMANOOR, NEAR M.V.H.S.S.,
                 POOVAR P.O., THIRUPURAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA
                 TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

                 SRI.POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
                 SRI.R.V.ABHISHEK
                 SRI.JIBU P THOMAS
                 SRI.P.S.SURESH KUMAR

RESPONDENTS:

        1        THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ,KERALA STATE AUDIO-VISUAL
                 AND REPROGRAPHICAL CENTRE, (C-APT- CENTRE FOR
                 ADVANCE PRINTING TECHNOLOGY), VATTIYOORKKAVU,
                 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695013, RETITLED AS KERALA STATE
                 CENTRE FOR ADVANCE PRINTING AND TRAINING-C-APT.

        2        STATE OF KERALA
                 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
                 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

                 SMT.LATHA ANAND, SC
                 SRI.K.ANAND
                 SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN
                 SMT.K.K.RAZIYA , SC
                 SRI. SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE - GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
22.03.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).13881/2012(I), THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.13881 OF 2012(I) & CON.CASE

                                        3


                                   JUDGMENT

Dated this the 22nd day of March 2021

The petitioners in these two cases - which are being

disposed of together on account of the analogous nature of the

factual circumstances pleaded and the reliefs sought for - are

stated to have retired from the services of the Kerala State

Audio - Visual and Reprographical Centre (C-Apt). According

to the petitioners, even though large amounts are due to them

as Terminal Benefits, Leave Surrender, Pay Revision arrears,

Bonus and Gratuity, no amounts have been yet paid to them;

and they, therefore, pray that an amount of Rs.2,99,213/-, as

far as the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.13881/2012 and an amount

of Rs.5,43,773/-, as regards the petitioner in W.P.(C)

No.15224/2012, be directed to be paid by the C-Apt at the

earliest.

2. Sri.Poovappally M.Ramachandran Nair, the learned

counsel for the petitioners in these cases, submitted that the

break up of the claims of the petitioners have been clearly

averred in paragraphs 12 (a), (b) and (c) in W.P.(C)

No.13881/2012 and in paragraphs 11 (a), (b) and (c) in W.P.(C)

No.15224/2012. He submitted that the C-Apt, in their counter WP(C).No.13881 OF 2012(I) & CON.CASE

pleadings, admits certain portions of these claims and

therefore, prayed that the said amounts be ordered to be paid

immediately; while the balance be directed to be considered

by them in terms of law, after affording necessary opportunity

of being heard to his clients also.

3. The learned standing counsel for the C-Apt - Smt.Latha

Anand, submitted that the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.15224/2012

has already been paid an amount of Rs.2,14,177/-; while an

amount of Rs.1,70,074/- is admitted as far as the petitioner in

W.P.(C) No.13881/2012 is concerned. She submitted that the

C-Apt is presently going through financial crisis and therefore,

prayed that they be granted three months time to pay off the

aforesaid amount. She, therefore, prayed that W.P.(C)

No.15224/2012 be dismissed and W.P.(C) No.13881/2012 be

disposed of acceding to her afore request.

4. Sri.Poovappally M.Ramachandran Nair, at this time,

submitted that even though his clients do not stand in the way

of the C-Apt paying the admitted amounts in W.P.(C)

No.13881/2012 in three months, its competent Authority be

directed to hear both the petitioners with respect to the

difference in the claims, which certainly represents a dispute.

He, therefore, prayed that these writ petitions be disposed of WP(C).No.13881 OF 2012(I) & CON.CASE

directing the C-Apt to do so.

5. When I consider the afore submissions, it is clear that

in both these cases, the C-Apt admits to certain amounts, but

do not agree to the balance. Obviously, therefore, there is a

dispute which will have to be resolved in terms of law.

6. In the afore circumstances, I dispose of both these writ

petitions directing the C-Apt to hear the petitioners and to

consider their claims, as have been averred in these writ

petitions, thus leading to an appropriate order thereon, as

expeditiously as is possible, but not later than four months

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

As far as W.P.(C) No.13881/2012 is concerned, the C-Apt

is directed to pay the admitted amount of Rs.1,70,074/- to the

petitioner therein within a period of four months from the date

of receipt of a copy of this judgment

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

Stu JUDGE WP(C).No.13881 OF 2012(I) & CON.CASE

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15224/2012 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE NO.

KSAVRC/7398/99 DATED 22/04/2000.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO.

KSAVRC/2247/2000/3/8 DATED 06/01/2001.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO.

KSAVRC/2247/2000/3/8 DATED 17/01/2001.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO. KSAVRC/13418/06 DATED 02/02/2010.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION DATED 19/01/2012 FOR SERVICE BENEFITS ETC.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ADVICE MEMO DATED 26/12/2011.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER NO.30409/2009/E9 DATED 16/01/2012.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE NO.

C-APT/357/12/11/EST DATED 19/01/2012.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO.C-APT/357/12/EST.

DATED 19/01/2012.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE MEMO NO.1978/12/GCP/E7 DATED 20/01/2012.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.

37054/2009(B) DATED 22/12/2009.

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.33903/2008(J) DATED 06/04/2011.

EXHIBIT P13 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.2031/2012 DATED 13/02/2012.

WP(C).No.13881 OF 2012(I) & CON.CASE

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13881/2012 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. KS AVRC/4747/95 DATED 13/03/1996.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO. KSAVRC/6372/2008 DATED 01/07/2008.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.

KSAVRC/2276/2009/RTI DATED 23/04/2009.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE NO.

KSAVRC/2350/09 DATED 23/04/2009.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER NO. KSAVRC/2350/09 DATED 23/04/2004 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.37054/2009(B) DATED 22/12/2009.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.33903/2008(J) DATED 06/04/2011.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.2031/2012 DATED 13/02/2012.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAST REQUEST FOR THE ENTIRE DUES DATED 31/05/2012.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter