Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9300 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.6977 OF 2021(V)
PETITIONER:
JYOTHI PROVINCE OF KOTHAMANGALAM OF SH
CONGREGATION, SH PROVINCIAL HOUSE,
KOTHAMANGALAM 686 691, REPRESENTED BY PROVINCIAL
SUPERIOR, SR. CHRISTINA AUGUSTINE.
BY ADVS.
SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN
SRI.B.SAJEEV KUMAR
SMT.BLOSSOM MATHEW
SRI.RENJIT JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM 682 030
3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
FORT KOCHI, REVENUE DIVISION OFFICE,
ERNAKULAM 682 001
4 THE TAHSILDAR (L.R),
KANAYANNUR TALUK, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE,
ERNAKULAM 682 011
W.P.(C) No.6977 of 2021 2
5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
ELAMKULAM VILLAGE OFFICE, ELAMKULAM,
KOCHI 682 017
SRI.K.J.MANURAJ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
19.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.6977 of 2021 3
W.P.(C) No.6977 of 2021
-----------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Ext.P4 is an application preferred by the petitioner in Form
No.5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules for
removal of the property of the petitioner referred to in the writ petition
from the data bank prepared in terms of the Kerala conservation of Paddy
Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ
petition concerns the inaction on the part of the third respondent in
taking a decision on Ext.P4 application.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the
learned Government Pleader.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case and the orders passed by this court in similar and identical writ
petitions, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the
third respondent to take up and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 in
accordance with law, if the same is received and pending, after affording
the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Ordered accordingly. This shall
be done within three months from the date of production of a copy of this
judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. If the
application directed to be disposed of is found defective, the defect shall
be intimated to the petitioner by the third respondent immediately on
production of a copy of this judgment, and the third respondent will be
entitled to avail the time taken by the petitioner to cure the defects in the
said application also, for compliance of the directions contained in the
judgment. It is made clear that the hearing in terms of this judgment can
either be physical or through video conference. All other issues are left
open.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
YKB
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 2535/1988 OF ERNALKULAM SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 2321/1989 OF ERNAKULAM SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE DATA BANK
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 19-02-
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 23-
02-2021
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATIONS DATED 19-
02-2021 TO RE-ASSESS THE PROPERTY AND CHANGE, NATURE OF THE PROPERTY FROM NILAM TO PURAYIDOM
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 23-
02-2021
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!