Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8838 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 26TH PHALGUNA, 1942
Tr.P(C).No.111 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 1804/2020 OF FAMILY
COURT,THRISSUR
PETITIONER:
ATHIRA KRISHNA
AGED 23 YEARS
D/O.LATE RADHAKRISHNAN V.K.,
VARAYATTUPADY HOUSE,
KUNNAPPILLY P.O.,
THRISSUR, KERALA 680 311
NOW RESIDING AT VI/165 B P.K.BUILDERS,
OPPOSITE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK,
MALIKAMPEEDIKA KARA,
ALANGAD PANCHAYATH,
NORTH PARAVUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SMT.SIKHA G.NAIR
RESPONDENT:
NITHIN.P.S
AGED 30 YEARS,
S/O.SUDHAKARAN P.I.,
PUDUKADAN HOUSE,
MANNAMPETTA, VARAKARA P.O.,
THRISSUR, KERALA 680 302.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
17.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Tr.P(C).No.111 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17th day of March 2021
Petitioner has filed this Transfer Petition seeking transfer
of O.P. No.1804/2020, from the files of Family Court, Thrissur to
Family Court, Ernakulam. She is the wife, the respondent in the
O.P. The Original Petition was filed by the petitioner's husband for
restitution of conjugal rights.
2. I heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner as well as the respondent.
3. The contention of the petitioner is that she is
employed in a supermarket in Aluva. She is also living in Aluva
along with her family. It is submitted that, she cannot participate
in the proceedings before Family Court, Thrissur, while being
employed in Aluva undertaking day to day travel to the instant
court. It is further pointed out that she cannot undertake a long
journey from Aluva to Thrissur. The place convenient for conduct of
litigations, according to her, is the Family Court, Ernakulam.
4. The learned counsel for the respondent submits
that the respondent is residing in Varakara which is within the
jurisdictional limits of Family Court, Thrissur and no inconvenience Tr.P(C).No.111 OF 2021
will be caused to the petitioner, if she is to contest the litigation
pending before Family Court, Thrissur.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted
that, on a previous occasion the respondent/husband sought to
transfer the same O.P. pending before Family Court, Thrissur and it
was dismissed by this Court on merits. Having considered the
submissions made by the counsel appearing on either side, I am of
the opinion that O.P.No.1804/2020 before Family Court, Thrissur,
shall be ordered to be transferred to Family Court, Ernakulam.
In the result, the Transfer Petition is allowed
withdrawing O.P.No.1804/2020 from the file of Family Court,
Thrissur and making it over to Family Court, Ernakulam. The
transferee Family Court on receipt of the records shall fix an early
date for appearance of the parties before that court and issue
notice to them.
Sd/-
T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE
SMF Tr.P(C).No.111 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF ORIGINAL PETITION 1804/2020 FILED BEFORE THE HONORABLE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF ORIGINAL PETITION 2023/2020 PENDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM.
//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!