Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8453 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.4844 OF 2021(E)
PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED SHIHABUDHEEN M.P.,
AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. HUSSAINKUTTY,
33/969- VADAKKEKANJIRATHINGAL, MARIKUNNU P.O,
KOZHIKODE - 673 012.
BY ADV. SMT.T.V.NEEMA
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE COMMISSIONER,
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR GOVERNMENT
EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 012.
2 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER,
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR GOVERNMENT
EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 012.
3 THE HEADMASTER,
GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KODUVALLY,
KOZHIKODE - 673 572.
BY ADV. SMT.VINITHA.B, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.4844 OF 2021(E)
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P9
order, by which his application for correction
of his name in the SSLC book has been returned
stating that the publication in Gazette
notification is sufficient.
2. The petitioner's name was entered in
the SSLC book as 'SIHABUDHEEN' instead of
'SHIHABUDHEEN'. He got the spelling of his
name corrected by adding an 'H' immediately
after the 1st letter 'S' by publication in the
Gazette, as per Ext.P5 notification dated
19.09.2019; he got Ext.P6 'one and the same
certificate', from the Village Officer on
13.10.2019. He had submitted Ext.P3
application to the Headmaster of GMUP school,
Arambram, for correction of his name in the
school records and the Headmaster forwarded
the same as per Ext.P4 letter dated WP(C).No.4844 OF 2021(E)
24.08.2020. In that letter, the Headmaster had
informed that the original admission register
of the school got destructed due to passage of
time. On receipt of the application, the Joint
Commissioner made Ext.P7 endorsement stating
that the spelling given for his name was in
tune with the English version of his name; but
it was stated that there was some discrepancy
in the entries as to his father's name, house
name, etc, and it was necessary to have the
school records corrected. Thereupon, he
submitted Ext.P8 representation to Joint
Commissioner providing his clarifications on
the discrepancies noticed in the name of his
father, house name, etc. Petitioner pointed
out the statement of the Headmaster that the
original school register is not available on
account of the lapse of time. Pointing out the
Gazette notification as well as the 'one and WP(C).No.4844 OF 2021(E)
same certificate', he again requested for
correcting the spelling of his name in the
SSLC book. The name of the petitioner has
already been corrected in the Aadhaar card,
Passport, Driving Licence etc. Ext.P9 is
issued thereafter stating that petitioner need
to produce the Gazette notification only.
3. Heard the learned Counsel for the
petitioner as well as the learned Government
Pleader.
4. As pointed out by the petitioner, it
would not be feasible to produce a copy of the
Gazette notification wherever petitioner's
name is required. The purposes where the name
is required to be furnished would be different
and it would have to be given in different
modes. When the name is required in digital
mode, there may not be a provision to upload
the Gazette notification. The name would also WP(C).No.4844 OF 2021(E)
be required for the purpose of education/
employment of his children/family members.
Perhaps the name of father given in the school
records of his children also would be required
to be corrected based on the correction
notified. It would not be feasible or
practicable to produce a copy of the Gazette
notification wherever the name of the
petitioner is required. A correction in the
SSLC book itself would be required for all
these purposes. Therefore the conclusion of
the 2nd respondent that correction of the
spelling in the name entered in his SSLC book
is not necessary, cannot be correct or
sustainable.
In the above circumstances, the Ext.P9
order passed by the 2nd respondent is set
aside. The 2nd respondent shall reconsider
Ext.P4 application forwarded by the Headmaster WP(C).No.4844 OF 2021(E)
and to take expeditious action for effecting
correction in the spelling of the name of the
petitioner in his SSLC Book in tune with the
name notified in Ext.P5 Gazette notification,
within a period of two months from the date of
receipt of a copy of the judgment.
Accordingly, the writ petition is
disposed of. Sd/-
P.V.ASHA
JUDGE
ww
WP(C).No.4844 OF 2021(E)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 18.2.2019.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE SSLC
BOOK OF THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED
13.01.2020 OF GMUP SCHOOL, ARAMBRAM.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER SENT BY HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KODUVALLY, KOZHIKODE TO 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24.12.2019.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 19.9.2019.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHEVAYUR DATED 13.10.2019.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF REJECTION ORDER NO. EX/JB2/ 24971/2020/CGE/H.DIS. DATED 9.11.2020.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 7/12/2020.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER NO.JP2/ 1068/2021/CGE/N. DIS DATED 25/1/2021.
EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!