Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8374 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.6371 OF 2021(V)
PETITIONER:
ABDUL AZIZ ANZAR, AGED 23 YEARS
S/O.M.A.ANZAR, SHAMNA GARDENS, MANGADUCHERY,
KILIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM - 691 004.
BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SIYAD
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
KOLLAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION ROAD,
KAANKATHU MUKKU, KOLLAM.
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
RDO OFFICE, PUNALUR - 691 305.
3 THE THAHASILDAR, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK
TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA - 691 506.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
VETTIKKAVALA VILLAGE,
VETTIKKAVALA VILLAGE OFFICE, PIN- 691 531.
5 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
KRISHI BHAVAN, VETTIKKAVALA,
KOLLAM, PIN - 691 531.
6 THE CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING
COMMITTEE
VETTIKAVALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PANCHAYATH
OFFICE, SABARIMALA BYPASS, KOLLAM - 691 531.
W.P.(C) No.6371 of 2021 2
SRI. RAVIKRISHNAN, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.6371 of 2021 3
W.P.(C) No.6371 of 2021
-----------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Ext.P2 is an application preferred by the petitioner in
Form No.5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland
Rules (the Rules) for removal of the property of the petitioner
referred to in the writ petition from the data bank prepared in
terms of the Kerala conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act,
2008 (the Act). Ext.P3 is another application preferred by the
petitioner in Form No.7 of the Rules for permission to utilize the
said land which is an un-notified land in terms of the Act, for other
purposes. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition
concerns the inaction on the part of the second respondent in
taking a decision on Ext.P2 and Ext.P3 applications.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as
also the learned Government Pleader.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of
the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition
directing the second respondent to take up and pass appropriate
orders on Ext.P2 in accordance with law, if the same is received
and pending, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of
hearing. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say that if Ext.P2
application is allowed, orders shall be passed by the second
respondent simultaneously on Ext.P3 application as well. This shall
be done within three months from the date of production of a copy
of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the
petitioner. If the applications directed to be disposed of are found
defective, the defect shall be intimated to the petitioner by the
second respondent immediately on production of a copy of this
judgment, and the second respondent will be entitled to avail the
time taken by the petitioner to cure the defects in the applications
also, for compliance of the directions contained in this judgment.
It is made clear that the hearing in terms of this judgment can
either be physical or through video conference.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Ds 12.03.2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 03/11/2020.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NO.5 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15/02/2021.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NO.7 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15/02/2021.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CHALLAN FOR THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 27A DATED 16/02/2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!