Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7641 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2021
RSA 497/2018 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Present:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
Thursday,the 4th day of March 2021/13th Phalguna, 1942
IA.NO.1/2021 IN RSA No.497/2018 (A)
For information purpose only
OS No.628/2012 of the ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ALAPPUZHA
AS No.43/2015 of the II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
REMANAN,
AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, MANNUMPURATH HOUSE,
KELATH WARD, ARYAD SOUTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTs/RESPONDENTS:
1. CHITHRAN,
S/O. KORU, THYPPARAMBIL HOUSE, VATTAYAL WARD, ALAPPUZHA
WEST VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 011.
2. REVAMMA
W/O. CHITHRAN, THYPPARAMBIL HOUSE, VATTAYAL
WARD, ALAPPUZHA WEST VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 011.
3. RAJANISH,
S/O. CHITHRAN, THYPPARAMBIL HOUSE, VATTAYAL
WARD, ALAPPUZHA WEST VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 011.
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed
therewith the High Court be pleased to issue a temporary injunction restraining
the respondents from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the
petition/plaint schedule property, committing waste or mischief thereon or
encroaching upon the plaint schedule property in any manner pending disposal of
the Second Appeal.
This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application and the
affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon hearing the arguments of M/S .
S.SANAL KUMAR,BHAVANA V,T.J.SEEMA, Advocates for the petitioner and of
RSA 497/2018 2/4
SRI.SIBI THOMAS JACOB, Advocate for the Respondents, the court passed the
following:
For information purpose only
RSA 497/2018 3/4
N. ANIL KUMAR, J.
-------------------------------------------
R.S.A.No.497 of 2018
---------------------------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of March, 2021
ORDER
For information purpose only I.A. No.1 of 2021
This RSA is filed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.43/2015 of the
District Court, Alappuzha, whereby the judgment and decree in O.S.No.25/1993
of the Principal Sub Court, Alappuzha was confirmed.
2. The suit was filed for permanent prohibitory injunction against trespass and
committing waste therein. Both the Trial Court and the Appellate Court concurrently entered a finding that the plaintiff/appellant has not been in
possession of the suit property on the date of suit and the plaintiff has no valid
cause of action to institute the suit.
3. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant/plaintiff filed the present
application restraining the respondents from interfering with the possession and
enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, committing waste or mischief thereon
or encroaching upon the plaint schedule property in any manner, pending
disposal of the second appeal.
4. In view of the concurrent finding of the Trial Court and Appellate Court that
the appellant/plaintiff has not been in the possession of the suit property on the
date of suit, it is not just and proper to grant an interim injunction in exercise of
the powers under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure protecting
possession of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property. However,
respondents 1 and 2 have no manner of right to commit waste or mischief
thereon, until the appeal is decided on merits.
5. In the result, I.A.No.1 of 2021 is allowed in part. The
respondents/defendants are restrained from committing waste or mischief in the
plaint schedule property, till the regular second appeal is decided on merits. In RSA 497/2018 4/4
view of urgency, post the appeal for final hearing on merits, on 24.03.2021.
Sd/-
N. ANIL KUMAR, JUDGE kkj
/true copy/ Sd/-
For information purpose only ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!