Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7591 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.3983 OF 2021(W)
PETITIONERS:
1 CHUNKAN THAYAPPAN,
AGED 55 YEARS,
S/O.THAYAPPAN, THERA TRIBAL SETTLEMENT COLONY,
POOYAMKUTTY, KUTTAMPUZHA VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2 GIRISH M.G.,
AGED 52 YEARS,
S/O.GOPALAN, URIYAMPETTY TRIBAL SETTLEMENT COLONY,
POOYAMKUTTY, KUTTAMPUZHA VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3 ANIL,
AGED 45 YEARS,
S/O.PONNUPILLA, WARRIAM TRIBAL SETTLEMENT COLONY,
POOYAMKUTTY, KUTTAMPUZHA VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.C.DEVASIA
SMT.ANCY MATHEW
SRI.MATHEW DEVASSI
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER,
VIKAS BHAVAN, LEGISLATURE COMPLEX,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 003.
2 THE DISTRICT ELECTORAL OFFICER(DISTRICT COLLECTOR),
COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 030.
BY ADVS. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC, ELE.COMMN.
SMT.PRINCY XAVIER, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.3983 OF 2021(W)
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioners claim that there are
families in Warriam and 26 families in Thera
settlement colonies and there are several
voters in these colonies in different wards.
The grievance of the petitioners is that
there is no polling station provided for the
voters of these colonies.
2. It is stated that the voters have to
travel more than 20 Kms as far as Thera
settlement colony is concerned, who are in
Ward No.43, and for those in Ward No.44 in
Warriam settlement colony, they have to walk
15 Kms, and those in Ward No.46 in
Uriyampetty colony have to travel 30 Kms, for
the purpose of casting their votes. It is
pointed out that the casting of votes in
election has become a big task for the voters
of these colonies and also to exercise their WP(C).No.3983 OF 2021(W)
voting right independently and that it would
take 3 to 5 hours through the dense forest to
reach the polling station. Pointing out
these difficulties, petitioners have
submitted Ext.P2 representation before the 1st
respondent.
3. I am of the view that the claim
raised by the petitioners in Ext.P2
representation deserves emergent
consideration.
Therefore the writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the 1st
respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation
and to take a decision on the request as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate,
within a period of two weeks from the date of
receipt of a copy of the judgment.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA JUDGE WW WP(C).No.3983 OF 2021(W)
APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE VOTERS LIST ISSUED BY THE ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICE WITH RESPECT TO THESE COLONIES DATED 20.01.2021.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE OF THERA, WARRIAM AND URIYAMPETTY SETTLEMENT COLONIES DATED 26.12.2020 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!