Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13143 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2021/2ND ASHADHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 2202 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
JANAKIAMMA, AGED 75 YEARS,
D/O.LATE KRISHNA PILLAI, AMBATT HOUSE,
PANORAMA LANE, KUMARANASHAN ROAD,
KADAVANTHRA, PIN - 682 020.
BY ADVS.
P.HARIDAS
SRI.BIJU HARIHARAN
SRI.P.C.SHIJIN
SRI.RISHIKESH HARIDAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
AUTHORITY (SEIAA) REPRESENTED BY
ITS SECRETARY, K.S.R.T.C.BUS TERMINAL
COMPLEX, 4TH FLOOR, THAMPANOOR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 001.
3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
ADOOR, PIN - 689 101.
4 TAHSILDAR KOZHENCHERRY,
KOZHENCHERRY TALUK OFFICE,
GROUND FLOOR, MINI CIVIL STATION,
KOZHENCHERRY, THIRUVALLA - KUMBAZHA HIGHWAY,
PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA, PIN - 689 645.
WP(C) No.2202/2021
:2 :
5 GEOLOGIST PATHANAMTHITTA,
THE GEOLOGIST DISTRICT OFFICE,
DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,
5TH FLOOR, REVENUE TOWERS, ADOOR P.O.,
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 691 523.
6 DISTRICT ENGINEER,
KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689 645.
7 VILLAGE OFFICER, KULANADA,
VILLAGE OFFICE,
KULANADA, PIN - 689 503.
8 SECRETARY, KULANADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
KOZHENCHERRY TALUK,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689 503.
9 SAJI PLAMOOTTIL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
S/O.SAMUEL PLAMOOTTIL, PLAMOOTTIL HOUSE,
ULANADU P.O., PANDALAM,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689 503.
BY ADVS.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.G.RANJITA -R1, R3-R7.
SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN, SC FOR R2
SRI.V.SETHUNATH -R8
SRI.M.KIRANLAL-R9
SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN-R9
SRI.T.S.SARATH-R9
SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA)-R9
SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR-R9
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 23.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.2202/2021
:3 :
JUDGMENT
~~~~~~~~~
Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2021
The petitioner, a Senior Citizen and resident of
Kulanada Village, is seeking to direct the 4 th respondent to
take immediate action to see that the 9 th respondent shall not
conduct any mining or excavation in his property without
obtaining Environmental Clearance and mining permit.
2. The petitioner's property is on a hillock on the
western side of Polachira-Paanil PWD Road. The 9 th
respondent holds 25 cents of land on the northern side of the
petitioner's property. According to the petitioner, on the road
margin, these properties are at a height of 12 feet and is
inclined toward east up to 50 feet. The 9 th respondent is now
razing the entire hillock to the level of the road and is selling
earth lying higher than the road level. WP(C) No.2202/2021
3. The 9th respondent is allegedly exploiting red earth
without following the procedure prescribed under the Mines
and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The
excavation is dangerous as it will take away lateral support of
the petitioner's property resulting in danger to the life and
property. Though the petitioner filed complaints to the
competent authorities, no preventive or punitive action is taken
against the 9th respondent, contends the petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for the 9 th respondent, on the
other hand, submits that the 9 th respondent has obtained
development permit and developing the property following all
statutory rules. The 9th respondent has applied for Ext.R9(f)
application for mineral transit pass and he intends to construct
a house in his property before the onset of monsoon.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,
the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 1
and 3 to 7, the learned Standing Counsel for the 2 nd
respondent, learned Standing Counsel for the 8 th respondent-
Panchayat and the learned counsel for the 9 th respondent. WP(C) No.2202/2021
6. As the allegations levelled by the petitioner involve
disputed questions of facts, this Court is of the considered
opinion that competent statutory authorities shall consider the
grievances raised by the petitioner, at least at the first
instance. The petitioner has filed Exts.P2 and P5
representations before the 5th respondent-Geologist, before
whom the application of the 9 th respondent for mineral transit
pass is also pending.
In the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed
of directing the 5th respondent to consider Exts.P3 and P5
representations filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate
orders thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of six
weeks positively, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner and the 9th respondent. The 5th respondent may
resort to virtual hearing / video conferencing for hearing, if the
situation so warrants.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
aks/24.06.2021 WP(C) No.2202/2021
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 18/08/2020.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED
BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND
RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5, 7& 8 DATED 21/01/2021.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY 7TH RESPONDENT DATED 21/01/2021.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY 8TH RESPONDENT DATED 21/01/2021.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS DATED 22/01/2021.
ncd
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!