Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14501 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021
OP(KAT) No.22/2020 1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
Tuesday, the 13th day of July 2021 / 22nd Ashadha, 1943
OP(KAT) NO. 22 OF 2020
(AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.01.2020 IN O.A.NO.67/2020 OF KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BENCH)
PETITIONER/APPLICANT IN O.A:
CHANDANA R, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN PILLAI, MALAMEL
KUTTIYIL, MEMANA, OACHIRA P.O., KOLLAM - 690 526
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN O.A:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001
2. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004
OP(KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL) praying inter alia that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the OP(KAT) the
High Court be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to provisionally accept
the online application of the petitioner to the post of Assistant
Professor in English under Category 287/2019 pending disposal of the above
Original Petition.
This petition coming on for orders on 13/07/2021, upon perusing the
petition and the affidavit filed in support of OP(KAT) and this Court's
judgment dated 22/01/2020 and this court's order dated 2/03/2020 and upon
hearing the arguments of M/S P.NANDAKUMAR,S.ANEESH Advocates for the
petitioner, and of GOVERNMENT PLEADER for R1 and Sri.P.C.Sasidharan
Standing Counsel, KPSC for R2, the court passed the following:
OP(KAT) No.22/2020 2/3
K. Vinod Chandran & V.G. Arun, JJ.
-------------------------------------
O.P(KAT) No.22 of 2020
------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2021
O r d e r
Vinod Chandran, J.
The Under Secretary, Higher Education
Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
has filed an affidavit where it has been stated so:
"File was again circulated to Chief Minister from section on 3.8.2020 to decide on whether age relaxation be allowed on placing the case before Cabinet and this Government decided not to place the case before Cabinet and further decided to take decision by the administrative Departments."
2. We find the statement to be per se contemptuous and we
would like to know which officer of the Government
decided not to place the matter before the Cabinet
despite our specific direction to place it before the
appropriate authority, which obviously is the Cabinet.
We direct the officer to file an affidavit on the
specific statement pointed out by us, failing which, we OP(KAT) No.22/2020 3/3
O.P(KAT) No.22 of 2020
will be forced to initiate contempt proceedings.
Post on 25.08.2021.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE
Sd/-
V.G. ARUN JUDGE jma
13-07-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!